Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15441 - 15450 of 56190 for n y c.

[PDF] Frontsheet
R. Tlusty JUSTICES: CONCURRED: CONCURRED/DISSENTED: ROGGENSACK, C. J. concurs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168450 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI 77
: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Patrick C. Carter
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52056 - 2014-09-15

Frontsheet
of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Patrick C. Carter, Defendant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52056 - 2010-07-13

[PDF] WI 94
2008-09. The Act specified that the transfer was being made "[n]otwithstanding section 655.27(6
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52424 - 2014-09-15

Frontsheet
-09. The Act specified that the transfer was being made "[n]otwithstanding section 655.27(6
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52424 - 2010-07-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
supervision time. WIS. STAT. §§ 302.05(3)(c)2., 302.045(3m)(b); but see State v. Gramza, 2020 WI App 81, ¶3
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023134 - 2025-10-14

[PDF] Appeal No. 2009AP2973 Cir. Ct. No. 2009TP6
for unfitness. In keeping with this view, the Baby Girl K. court observed: “[C]ommentators have suggested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49229 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Supreme Court Open Rules Petition Conference
to amend SCRs 70.03 and 70.12(1)(c)3. and create SCR 70.12(5), (6) and 70.16, relating to the Supreme
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oac012114.pdf - 2014-01-14

[PDF] Open rules petition conference - March 17, 2015
changes; no court action required at this time C. Rule Petition 12-01: Report on Court’s Rule Making
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oac031715.pdf - 2015-03-09

[PDF] WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
(4)(c), both moots such aggrieved party’s individual claim and precludes such party from
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040297 - 2025-11-17