Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15451 - 15460 of 30012 for consulta de causas.
Search results 15451 - 15460 of 30012 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
Juneau County v. Sauk County
, or its application to undisputed facts, is a question of law which we decide de novo, without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12469 - 2017-09-21
, or its application to undisputed facts, is a question of law which we decide de novo, without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12469 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s decision to deny a postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91964 - 2013-01-23
court’s decision to deny a postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91964 - 2013-01-23
Timothy J. Gross v. Gail M. Gross
de novo. Id. at 846‑47, 454 N.W.2d at 58. Under Wis. Adm. Code § HSS 80.02(21), a “serial family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9009 - 2005-03-31
de novo. Id. at 846‑47, 454 N.W.2d at 58. Under Wis. Adm. Code § HSS 80.02(21), a “serial family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9009 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph A. Weiss
presents a legal issue that we review de novo. State v. Rodriguez, 205 Wis.2d 620, 626, 556 N.W.2d 140
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13402 - 2005-03-31
presents a legal issue that we review de novo. State v. Rodriguez, 205 Wis.2d 620, 626, 556 N.W.2d 140
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13402 - 2005-03-31
David L. Gilbert v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
review de novo. Ansani v. Cascade Mountain, Inc., 223 Wis. 2d 39, 45, 588 N.W.2d 321 (Ct. App. 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2903 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. Ansani v. Cascade Mountain, Inc., 223 Wis. 2d 39, 45, 588 N.W.2d 321 (Ct. App. 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2903 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
). ¶6 Whether police conduct was coercive is a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59405 - 2011-01-26
). ¶6 Whether police conduct was coercive is a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59405 - 2011-01-26
State v. James J. Mischler
. The application of a statute to undisputed facts is a question of law which we review de novo. See Gonzalez v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12701 - 2005-03-31
. The application of a statute to undisputed facts is a question of law which we review de novo. See Gonzalez v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12701 - 2005-03-31
State v. Paul E. Magnuson
construction, and we review the trial court’s decision de novo. State v. Gavigan, 122 Wis.2d 389, 391, 362 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13904 - 2005-03-31
construction, and we review the trial court’s decision de novo. State v. Gavigan, 122 Wis.2d 389, 391, 362 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13904 - 2005-03-31
WI App 15 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP599-CR Complete Titl...
principles to the findings of fact de novo. Id. Further, we are not constrained to the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58245 - 2011-01-30
principles to the findings of fact de novo. Id. Further, we are not constrained to the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58245 - 2011-01-30
State v. Jared J.
of a statute presents a question of law which we are to review de novo. See R.W.S. v. State, 156 Wis.2d 526
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12837 - 2005-03-31
of a statute presents a question of law which we are to review de novo. See R.W.S. v. State, 156 Wis.2d 526
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12837 - 2005-03-31