Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15451 - 15460 of 29740 for des.
Search results 15451 - 15460 of 29740 for des.
Timothy J. Lipke v. Tri-County Area School Board
). This is a question that we decide de novo, without deference to the trial court’s determination. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12318 - 2005-03-31
). This is a question that we decide de novo, without deference to the trial court’s determination. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12318 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 127
. § 973.015. Interpretation and application of a statute is a matter of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129267 - 2017-09-21
. § 973.015. Interpretation and application of a statute is a matter of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129267 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to those facts is reviewed de novo. See State v. Blatterman, 2015 WI 46, ¶26 n.9, 362 Wis. 2d 138, 864
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176618 - 2017-09-21
to those facts is reviewed de novo. See State v. Blatterman, 2015 WI 46, ¶26 n.9, 362 Wis. 2d 138, 864
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176618 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Roland A. Smart
to seek de novo review. Id. at ¶6. The supreme court determined this distinction was without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4996 - 2017-09-19
to seek de novo review. Id. at ¶6. The supreme court determined this distinction was without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4996 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
claim. Discussion ¶9 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175141 - 2017-09-21
claim. Discussion ¶9 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175141 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
presents a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Ziebart, 2003 WI App 258, ¶26, 268 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872275 - 2024-11-06
presents a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Ziebart, 2003 WI App 258, ¶26, 268 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872275 - 2024-11-06
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Fortier, 2006 WI App 11, ¶18, 289 Wis. 2d 179, 709 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143085 - 2015-06-16
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Fortier, 2006 WI App 11, ¶18, 289 Wis. 2d 179, 709 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143085 - 2015-06-16
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Sara M.
in a proceeding in circuit court is a question of law, which we review de novo. Thomas Y. v. St. Croix County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13584 - 2005-03-31
in a proceeding in circuit court is a question of law, which we review de novo. Thomas Y. v. St. Croix County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13584 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Confucius Gooden
of a plea agreement presents an issue of law which we review de novo. See State v. Poole, 131 Wis.2d 359
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11869 - 2017-09-21
of a plea agreement presents an issue of law which we review de novo. See State v. Poole, 131 Wis.2d 359
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11869 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael W. Worden
a question of law that we review de novo. See State ex rel. Frederick v. McCaughtry, 173 Wis. 2d 222, 225
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2116 - 2005-03-31
a question of law that we review de novo. See State ex rel. Frederick v. McCaughtry, 173 Wis. 2d 222, 225
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2116 - 2005-03-31