Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15451 - 15460 of 65171 for or b.

County of Sheboygan v. Research Universal Life Church
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Sheboygan County: JOHN B. MURPHY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9789 - 2005-03-31

State v. Pastori M. Balele
of the circuit court for Dane County: Paul B. Higginbotham, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4686 - 2005-03-31

Patricia M. Morris (Deceased) v. Labor and Industry Review Commission and State of Wisconsin
OF WISCONSIN and GREAT ATLANTIC and PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, d/b/a KOHL'S FOOD STORES
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11025 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
property brought to the marriage by each party.” Sec. 767.61(3)(b). ¶11 As noted, Julia brought two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226919 - 2018-11-14

[PDF] John A. Rooyakkers v. Village of Little Chute
. Accordingly, the Village established a special assessment pursuant to its police powers under § 66.60(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8704 - 2017-09-19

State v. Alexander Stocks
him of retail theft – habitual criminality, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 943.50(1m)(b) and 939.62 (1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5027 - 2005-03-31

John Louis Castellani v. Wisconsin Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company (WILMIC)
court for Racine County: allan b. torhorst, Judge. Affirmed. Before Nettesheim, Anderson and Snyder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15779 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: juan b. colas, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111588 - 2014-05-05

Iiw Engineers & Surveyors v. Albert Richter
. Code § ILHR 10.01(65)(b). Summary judgment methodology is well established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9472 - 2005-03-31

Lori L. Fleig v. Patrick A. Fleig
. Whether the change is substantial is a question of law that we review de novo, “[b]ut, because this legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2808 - 2005-03-31