Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15451 - 15460 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 15451 - 15460 of 64042 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the records as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033813 - 2025-11-04
an independent review of the records as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033813 - 2025-11-04
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. No. 2024AP378-CRNM 2 independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054644 - 2025-12-23
. No. 2024AP378-CRNM 2 independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054644 - 2025-12-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231939 - 2019-01-15
a response to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231939 - 2019-01-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206804 - 2018-01-08
). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206804 - 2018-01-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2023AP2167-CRNM 2 review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910733 - 2025-02-06
. No. 2023AP2167-CRNM 2 review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910733 - 2025-02-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=624006 - 2023-02-21
. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=624006 - 2023-02-21
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the records, we conclude that the judgments may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97143 - 2013-05-16
and an independent review of the records, we conclude that the judgments may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97143 - 2013-05-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Appeals Commission. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136840 - 2017-09-21
Appeals Commission. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136840 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jeffrey R. Lofgren
of an expert witness at sentencing. Because we conclude that the record does not support the factual predicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3550 - 2005-03-31
of an expert witness at sentencing. Because we conclude that the record does not support the factual predicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3550 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Timothy W. Barnes
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), NO. 96-3126-CR-NM 2 we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11634 - 2017-09-19
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), NO. 96-3126-CR-NM 2 we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11634 - 2017-09-19