Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15461 - 15470 of 30126 for consulta de causas.

Charles Schroeder v. Linda Wacker
. As such, it presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See Probst v. Winnebago County, 208 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2130 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Dustin W. B.
of constitutional standards to undisputed facts, a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Foust, 214
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5191 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. William E. Conley
prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12922 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
the application of undisputed facts to a statute. This presents a question of law which we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35614 - 2009-04-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Goff v. Seldera, 202 Wis. 2d 600, 616, 550 N.W.2d 144 (Ct. App. 1996). ¶8 Diane sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168418 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Michael L., Jr.
a restitution order comports with the statute is, however, subject to our de novo review. State v. Canady
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5302 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of reasonable suspicion de novo. See id. ¶10 Here, the circuit court found that Jaeger’s initial stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73001 - 2014-09-15

State v. Robert W. Sweat
] Statutory construction is a question of law which we review de novo. Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9391 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
be re-conferred when an amended petition is filed. Bell v. Employers Mut. Cas. Co. of Des Moines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=787729 - 2024-04-16

Mid-State Contracting, Inc. v. Superior Floor Company, Inc.
Whether to allow interest on a verdict is a question of law that we review de novo. See Weber v. CNW
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5060 - 2005-03-31