Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15461 - 15470 of 29810 for des.

[PDF] Evelyn Ferrer v. David I. Lopez
Construction of a statute, or its application to undisputed facts, is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15406 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Jesse Hardy Swinson v. Gary R. McCaughtry
, not that of the circuit court, and our review is de novo. See State ex rel. Whiting v. Kolb, 158 Wis. 2d 226, 233, 461
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4265 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the [circuit] court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether those
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208808 - 2018-02-21

COURT OF APPEALS
: de novo. See State v. Howell, 2007 WI 75, ¶¶30, 78, 301 Wis. 2d 350, 369, 388, 734 N.W.2d 48, 57, 67
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74805 - 2011-12-21

[PDF] State v. Thong L. Soun
then independently apply the law to those facts de novo.” State v. Hughes, 2000 WI 24, ¶15, 233 Wis. 2d 280, 607
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21078 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jose G. Corpus
and that the information was prejudicial. Id., ¶22. A constitutional issue is presented which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19314 - 2005-08-16

[PDF] Frontsheet
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179279 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Michael M. Longcore
for a safety glass violation. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law this court undertakes de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14556 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 127
erroneous. Id., ¶12. Then, we review de novo whether those facts constitute a Fourth Amendment violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69202 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Id. Discussion ¶8 In order to modify a maintenance award, the moving party must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78373 - 2012-02-21