Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15461 - 15470 of 65136 for or b.
Search results 15461 - 15470 of 65136 for or b.
CA Blank Order
as to whether to accept or refuse medication or treatment.”[4] Sec. 51.61(1)(g)4.b. We conclude the County met
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103726 - 2013-11-05
as to whether to accept or refuse medication or treatment.”[4] Sec. 51.61(1)(g)4.b. We conclude the County met
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103726 - 2013-11-05
State v. Troy Lee Perkins
behavior contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 944.20(1)(b), 939.51(3)(a). ¶3 Desirae K
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26198 - 2006-08-14
behavior contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 944.20(1)(b), 939.51(3)(a). ¶3 Desirae K
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26198 - 2006-08-14
COURT OF APPEALS
of Dexter and that Kueffer did not unlawfully take or detain Dexter. See Wis. Stat. § 810.13(1)(a)-(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77789 - 2012-02-08
of Dexter and that Kueffer did not unlawfully take or detain Dexter. See Wis. Stat. § 810.13(1)(a)-(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77789 - 2012-02-08
[PDF]
County of Rock v. Gregory J. Sendelbach
with a prohibited alcohol concentration in violation of § 346.63(1)(b), STATS., and hit and run upon striking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9306 - 2017-09-19
with a prohibited alcohol concentration in violation of § 346.63(1)(b), STATS., and hit and run upon striking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9306 - 2017-09-19
State v. Thomas M. Slawatyniec
, contrary to § 346.63(1)(b). Slawatyniec claims the arresting officer lacked probable cause to administer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2869 - 2005-03-31
, contrary to § 346.63(1)(b). Slawatyniec claims the arresting officer lacked probable cause to administer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2869 - 2005-03-31
Lori L. Fleig v. Patrick A. Fleig
. Whether the change is substantial is a question of law that we review de novo, “[b]ut, because this legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2808 - 2005-03-31
. Whether the change is substantial is a question of law that we review de novo, “[b]ut, because this legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2808 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. § 980.08(8)(b) (“If the court finds after a hearing, by clear and convincing evidence, that the safety
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263245 - 2020-06-09
. § 980.08(8)(b) (“If the court finds after a hearing, by clear and convincing evidence, that the safety
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263245 - 2020-06-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
. CODE § DOC 331.04(2)(b) provides that a preliminary hearing “shall be held” unless “[t]he client has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29734 - 2014-09-15
. CODE § DOC 331.04(2)(b) provides that a preliminary hearing “shall be held” unless “[t]he client has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29734 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
(quoting Wis. Stat. § 785.03(1)(b) and stating that punitive sanctions must “be brought exclusively by ‘[t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53527 - 2010-08-18
(quoting Wis. Stat. § 785.03(1)(b) and stating that punitive sanctions must “be brought exclusively by ‘[t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53527 - 2010-08-18
[PDF]
Ervin Merten v. Carl Holzer
: JOHN B. MURPHY, Judge. Affirmed. Before Snyder, P.J., Brown and Anderson, JJ. NO. 97
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11935 - 2017-09-21
: JOHN B. MURPHY, Judge. Affirmed. Before Snyder, P.J., Brown and Anderson, JJ. NO. 97
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11935 - 2017-09-21