Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15461 - 15470 of 64884 for timed.
Search results 15461 - 15470 of 64884 for timed.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as timely as to the December 16, 2020 order denying his request for sentence modification
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=533054 - 2022-06-22
as timely as to the December 16, 2020 order denying his request for sentence modification
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=533054 - 2022-06-22
State v. Rey R. Palop
. ¶2 At the times relevant to the complaint, Palop was a physician in his residency program
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24992 - 2006-05-01
. ¶2 At the times relevant to the complaint, Palop was a physician in his residency program
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24992 - 2006-05-01
COURT OF APPEALS
the service of the reconfinement term imposed in case No. 2003CF2989 for his time in custody from November 28
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110526 - 2014-04-21
the service of the reconfinement term imposed in case No. 2003CF2989 for his time in custody from November 28
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110526 - 2014-04-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
this appeal and reinstate the time under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30 for filing a postconviction motion. In his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110625 - 2017-09-21
this appeal and reinstate the time under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30 for filing a postconviction motion. In his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110625 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
No. 2013CF112. St. Germaine did not timely file a notice of intent to pursue postconviction relief after
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210124 - 2018-03-28
No. 2013CF112. St. Germaine did not timely file a notice of intent to pursue postconviction relief after
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210124 - 2018-03-28
[PDF]
Gordon Wipperfurth v. Marvin Krzykowski
, the Wipperfurths argue that no ordinance was in effect at the time of their application. Their argument is based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11279 - 2017-09-19
, the Wipperfurths argue that no ordinance was in effect at the time of their application. Their argument is based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11279 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, but not known to the trial judge at the time of original sentencing, either because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142464 - 2017-09-21
, but not known to the trial judge at the time of original sentencing, either because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142464 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 67
, 2019. The court voted to hold the matter pending expiration of the 60-day period of time during
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242157 - 2019-06-12
, 2019. The court voted to hold the matter pending expiration of the 60-day period of time during
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242157 - 2019-06-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
758. The statute in effect at the time Gonzales committed his crimes allowed only one DNA surcharge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196710 - 2017-09-21
758. The statute in effect at the time Gonzales committed his crimes allowed only one DNA surcharge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196710 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of an informant, Karen Hicks, who at that time was known as Karen Franklin. Hicks testified at Givens’ trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37302 - 2014-09-15
of an informant, Karen Hicks, who at that time was known as Karen Franklin. Hicks testified at Givens’ trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37302 - 2014-09-15