Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15471 - 15480 of 29740 for des.
Search results 15471 - 15480 of 29740 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
commissioner denied Swieca’s motion, and Swieca moved for a de novo hearing in the circuit court. The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96228 - 2013-05-01
commissioner denied Swieca’s motion, and Swieca moved for a de novo hearing in the circuit court. The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96228 - 2013-05-01
Pierre A. LaForte v. Timothy W. Bandoli
, 697, 585 N.W.2d 826 (Ct. App. 1998). We review the trial court's decision de novo. See Millen v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2583 - 2005-03-31
, 697, 585 N.W.2d 826 (Ct. App. 1998). We review the trial court's decision de novo. See Millen v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2583 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. 1996). We review de novo whether the facts fulfill the legal standards necessary to establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32911 - 2008-06-02
. 1996). We review de novo whether the facts fulfill the legal standards necessary to establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32911 - 2008-06-02
[PDF]
State v. Heidi L. Williams
of law that we review de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102, 104 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4120 - 2017-09-20
of law that we review de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102, 104 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4120 - 2017-09-20
State v. Michelle S.
is a legal issue that we review de novo, State v. Thomas J.W., 213 Wis. 2d 264, 268–269, 570 N.W.2d 586, 587
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3318 - 2005-03-31
is a legal issue that we review de novo, State v. Thomas J.W., 213 Wis. 2d 264, 268–269, 570 N.W.2d 586, 587
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3318 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Kazim Investment, Inc.
application of the statute to undisputed facts present a question of law subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6160 - 2017-09-19
application of the statute to undisputed facts present a question of law subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6160 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Daniel Marcellus Johnson
of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law which we decide de novo. See id. at 97, 441 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11939 - 2017-09-21
of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law which we decide de novo. See id. at 97, 441 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11939 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
James R. Grassman v. Deanna L. Grassman
the change is substantial is a legal issue which we review de novo. See id. at 574. A “‘substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16143 - 2017-09-21
the change is substantial is a legal issue which we review de novo. See id. at 574. A “‘substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16143 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo.” Id. (quoting Three & One Co. v. Geilfuss, 178 Wis. 2d 400, 410, 504 N.W.2d 393 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108174 - 2017-09-21
de novo.” Id. (quoting Three & One Co. v. Geilfuss, 178 Wis. 2d 400, 410, 504 N.W.2d 393 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108174 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. State v. Howell, 2007 WI 75, ¶30, 301 Wis. 2d 350, 734 N.W.2d 48. We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245838 - 2019-09-04
. State v. Howell, 2007 WI 75, ¶30, 301 Wis. 2d 350, 734 N.W.2d 48. We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245838 - 2019-09-04