Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15471 - 15480 of 59312 for quit claim deed.
Search results 15471 - 15480 of 59312 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841904 - 2024-08-21
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841904 - 2024-08-21
[PDF]
State v. Stanley D. Sallay
him. Sallay made no request for an evidentiary hearing on his ineffective counsel claim however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10379 - 2017-09-20
him. Sallay made no request for an evidentiary hearing on his ineffective counsel claim however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10379 - 2017-09-20
State v. David Buck
. ¶5 To establish an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, a defendant must show both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15453 - 2005-03-31
. ¶5 To establish an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, a defendant must show both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15453 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Jean Rios appeals dismissal of her small claims action against Ryan Justmann. I affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238566 - 2019-04-04
Jean Rios appeals dismissal of her small claims action against Ryan Justmann. I affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238566 - 2019-04-04
[PDF]
Michelle Frank v. James Fritz
to Fritz’s parents. Frank claimed that Fritz’s parents were negligent in entrusting their vehicle to him.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12375 - 2017-09-21
to Fritz’s parents. Frank claimed that Fritz’s parents were negligent in entrusting their vehicle to him.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12375 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, “the Kallembachs”) appeal a small claims judgment entered in favor of the Kallembachs’ tenants, Ryan Semlar, Daniel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72525 - 2011-10-19
, “the Kallembachs”) appeal a small claims judgment entered in favor of the Kallembachs’ tenants, Ryan Semlar, Daniel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72525 - 2011-10-19
Dennis Stensaas v. Jeffrey Becker
. The trial court concluded that the Stensaases did not have an unjust enrichment claim against Becker. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8290 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court concluded that the Stensaases did not have an unjust enrichment claim against Becker. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8290 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
“to correct or modify sentence” citing as authority WIS. STAT. § 973.19 (2005-06). 1 He claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30040 - 2014-09-15
“to correct or modify sentence” citing as authority WIS. STAT. § 973.19 (2005-06). 1 He claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30040 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the court’s granting of a motion for summary judgment dismissing his claims against Audi North Shore (Audi
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=666726 - 2023-06-13
the court’s granting of a motion for summary judgment dismissing his claims against Audi North Shore (Audi
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=666726 - 2023-06-13
COURT OF APPEALS
157 (1994) (postconviction claims that could have been raised in prior postconviction or appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34292 - 2008-10-14
157 (1994) (postconviction claims that could have been raised in prior postconviction or appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34292 - 2008-10-14