Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15481 - 15490 of 98629 for civil court case status online.

[PDF] Kerry L. Putnam v. Time Warner Cable of Southeastern Wisconsin
2002 WI 108 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 99-2078 COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17539 - 2017-09-21

Pamela S. Predick v. Margaret O'Connor
the civil injunction. ¶9 Margaret appeals from the trial court orders from both of the cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4975 - 2005-03-31

Tina M. Busch v. Margaret O'Connor
the civil injunction. ¶9 Margaret appeals from the trial court orders from both of the cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4976 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Pamela S. Predick v. Margaret O'Connor
2003 WI App 46 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 02-0503
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4975 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Tina M. Busch v. Margaret O'Connor
2003 WI App 46 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 02-0503
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4976 - 2017-09-19

James Antisdel v. City of Oak Creek Police and Fire Commission
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-3818 Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17340 - 2005-03-31

Vladimir M. Gorokhovsky v. Jan Edwards
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 14, 2003 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5091 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Debra Noble
), this court ruled that a notice of appeal in a civil case signed by a non-lawyer on behalf of a corporation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17583 - 2017-09-21

State v. Debra Noble
401 (1997), this court ruled that a notice of appeal in a civil case signed by a non-lawyer on behalf
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17583 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the circumstances of this case do not fall within the ambit of Cronic. ¶41 The United States Supreme Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81533 - 2012-04-25