Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15481 - 15490 of 30128 for consulta de causas.

State v. Ricardo Martinez
right to a fair trial and raises a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶7 The threshold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7401 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Tecia D.B.
termination of parental rights is a legal issue subject to de novo review. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6838 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey Sailing
not challenge any of the factual findings made by the trial court, we review de novo the question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11936 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Tomas R. Payano-Roman
border, citizens have a diminished expectation of privacy. See United States v. Montoya de Hernandez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18072 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
.”), aff’d, 2004 WI 41, 270 Wis. 2d 384, 677 N.W.2d 630. We review summary judgment decisions de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=661991 - 2023-05-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
for de novo review by the circuit court, which dismissed the request as untimely. Brian did not appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370198 - 2021-05-25

COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 309-10, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54126 - 2010-09-07

[PDF] Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital, Inc. v. Jerome B. Mueller
of review for summary judgment questions is de novo. Green Springs Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9105 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 17
a question of law that we review de novo. See Wilke v. City of Appleton, 197 Wis. 2d 717, 726, 541 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34744 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
consent. We decide the issue of whether the convictions are multiplicitous de novo. State v. Beasley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32211 - 2014-09-15