Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15481 - 15490 of 40222 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 15481 - 15490 of 40222 for financial disclosure statement.
Annette Slocum v. Robert Parsley
. The court found that the assault and Robert's subsequent statement satisfied the grounds for a harassment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7975 - 2005-03-31
. The court found that the assault and Robert's subsequent statement satisfied the grounds for a harassment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7975 - 2005-03-31
State v. Amy D. Zietlow
of extended supervision. On appeal, Zietlow argues that two statements by the court about her character were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6432 - 2005-03-31
of extended supervision. On appeal, Zietlow argues that two statements by the court about her character were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6432 - 2005-03-31
Jerry Saenz v. Gary McCaughtry
decision. We affirm. The conduct report alleged that Saenz made threatening statements to and spat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14336 - 2005-03-31
decision. We affirm. The conduct report alleged that Saenz made threatening statements to and spat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14336 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Amy D. Zietlow
statements by the court about her character were not supported by the record. Considerations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6432 - 2017-09-19
statements by the court about her character were not supported by the record. Considerations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6432 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Jerry Saenz v. Gary McCaughtry
that Saenz made threatening statements to and spat in the face of a corrections officer. He was found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14336 - 2014-09-15
that Saenz made threatening statements to and spat in the face of a corrections officer. He was found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14336 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, over trial counsel’s objection, the statements he obtained from M.F. and G.H. Johnson obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71440 - 2011-09-26
, over trial counsel’s objection, the statements he obtained from M.F. and G.H. Johnson obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71440 - 2011-09-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
examination report into evidence. Seth objected on the basis that the report contained hearsay statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1092470 - 2026-03-18
examination report into evidence. Seth objected on the basis that the report contained hearsay statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1092470 - 2026-03-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Johnson recounted, over trial counsel’s objection, the statements he obtained from M.F. and G.H
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71440 - 2014-09-15
Johnson recounted, over trial counsel’s objection, the statements he obtained from M.F. and G.H
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71440 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
been helpful to Stackhouse but could not be located, consistent with Stackhouse’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253798 - 2020-02-11
been helpful to Stackhouse but could not be located, consistent with Stackhouse’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253798 - 2020-02-11
COURT OF APPEALS
result at a trial. 4. Right of Allocution ¶29 At sentencing, Prouty read a lengthy statement he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54378 - 2010-09-14
result at a trial. 4. Right of Allocution ¶29 At sentencing, Prouty read a lengthy statement he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54378 - 2010-09-14