Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15481 - 15490 of 55766 for n y c.
Search results 15481 - 15490 of 55766 for n y c.
State v. John Allen
. § 971.30(2)(c) (2001-02), and must provide a "good faith argument" that the relevant law entitles
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16673 - 2005-03-31
. § 971.30(2)(c) (2001-02), and must provide a "good faith argument" that the relevant law entitles
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16673 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
)(c) has five subdivisions, but subd. 1 is the one applicable here. No. 2018AP1782 12
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=368829 - 2021-05-20
)(c) has five subdivisions, but subd. 1 is the one applicable here. No. 2018AP1782 12
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=368829 - 2021-05-20
[PDF]
Stanley W. Anderson v. The Regents of the University of California
the cause was submitted on the brief of Richard C. Ninneman, Donald K. Schott, and Jeffrey O. Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8642 - 2017-09-19
the cause was submitted on the brief of Richard C. Ninneman, Donald K. Schott, and Jeffrey O. Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8642 - 2017-09-19
State v. Peter A. Fonte
(1g)(c), analysis showing that a person's PAC was 0.1 or higher is prima facie evidence that he or she
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18576 - 2005-06-14
(1g)(c), analysis showing that a person's PAC was 0.1 or higher is prima facie evidence that he or she
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18576 - 2005-06-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
violated WIS. STAT. § 180.0831(2)(a), (2)(c), and (4), and there was no basis for James’ claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294503 - 2020-10-06
violated WIS. STAT. § 180.0831(2)(a), (2)(c), and (4), and there was no basis for James’ claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294503 - 2020-10-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in § 48.977(4)(c)1. ¶14 Within thirty days of filing of the petition, the court must hold a “plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195936 - 2017-09-21
in § 48.977(4)(c)1. ¶14 Within thirty days of filing of the petition, the court must hold a “plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195936 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
energy harvester.” Like the 2011 article, the 2012 application described “[a]n apparatus comprising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999289 - 2025-08-21
energy harvester.” Like the 2011 article, the 2012 application described “[a]n apparatus comprising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999289 - 2025-08-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 1, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
, or reversal of existing law or the establishment of new law. (c) The allegations and other factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28273 - 2007-02-28
, or reversal of existing law or the establishment of new law. (c) The allegations and other factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28273 - 2007-02-28
Pamela S. Predick v. Margaret O'Connor
was not enrolled. Id. at 956, 957 n.2, 962. We observe that in a subsequent unpublished case, the court limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4975 - 2005-03-31
was not enrolled. Id. at 956, 957 n.2, 962. We observe that in a subsequent unpublished case, the court limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4975 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Stats.” Marinette Cnty. v. Tammy C., 219 Wis. 2d 206, 209 n.1, 579 N.W.2d 635 (1998). Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550559 - 2022-08-02
, Stats.” Marinette Cnty. v. Tammy C., 219 Wis. 2d 206, 209 n.1, 579 N.W.2d 635 (1998). Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550559 - 2022-08-02