Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15481 - 15490 of 75215 for public records.
Search results 15481 - 15490 of 75215 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907310 - 2025-02-04
of the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907310 - 2025-02-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
mitigating factors. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286826 - 2020-09-16
mitigating factors. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286826 - 2020-09-16
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
review of the Record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919430 - 2025-02-26
review of the Record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919430 - 2025-02-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the supplemental report, and an independent review of the record, I conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=776304 - 2024-03-14
, the supplemental report, and an independent review of the record, I conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=776304 - 2024-03-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was advised of his right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108438 - 2017-09-21
was advised of his right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108438 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to do so. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460646 - 2021-12-07
to do so. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460646 - 2021-12-07
CA Blank Order
consideration of these submissions and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96877 - 2005-03-31
consideration of these submissions and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96877 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response, but he did not do so. Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728217 - 2023-11-14
a response, but he did not do so. Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728217 - 2023-11-14
CA Blank Order
not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138475 - 2014-12-14
not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138475 - 2014-12-14
State v. William L. Tinder
not appearing in the record, see State ex rel. Wolf v. Town of Lisbon, 75 Wis. 2d 152, 155-56, 248 N.W.2d 450
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3713 - 2005-03-31
not appearing in the record, see State ex rel. Wolf v. Town of Lisbon, 75 Wis. 2d 152, 155-56, 248 N.W.2d 450
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3713 - 2005-03-31