Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15491 - 15500 of 59254 for SMALL CLAIMS.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. Because Diaz’s postconviction claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158873 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
was at Sand Ridge, he filed several administrative grievances pursuant to DHS procedures claiming that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187247 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Dennis J. Porter
and a postconviction order summarily denying a motion for a new trial claiming two instances of ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10576 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 7, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
and Higginbotham, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Leon McQueen appeals from a judgment dismissing his claim against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27363 - 2006-12-06

Leon Irby v. Jon E. Litscher
System (ICRS). Prison system officials denied his claim, first on the ground that the decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5769 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the sufficiency of the criminal complaint to establish probable cause for his crimes. Because Davis’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93166 - 2014-09-15

Janice Johnson Kuhn v. Fitzgerald
of employee theft claims filed by her consignment company, Milwaukee Auction Galleries (MAG). Kuhn’s theory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15432 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
not respond. The court denied the motion. Claiming she had not received the order, counsel moved
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105209 - 2013-12-10

Harrison M. Marcum v. Donald Gudmanson
that the order must be affirmed as to Marcum’s state claims, but reversed as to any federal claims. Marcum’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11777 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that the petition fails to state a claim to challenge the DOC decision dismissing No. CCI-2023-13801 because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020803 - 2025-10-13