Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15491 - 15500 of 29823 for des.
Search results 15491 - 15500 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and whether the deficiency prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33046 - 2008-06-16
was deficient and whether the deficiency prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33046 - 2008-06-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
solely from the criminal complaint, this court reviews the circuit court’s ruling de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=793415 - 2024-04-25
solely from the criminal complaint, this court reviews the circuit court’s ruling de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=793415 - 2024-04-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review is de novo, State v. Tiepelman, 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d 179, 717 N.W.2d 1; however, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132114 - 2017-09-21
review is de novo, State v. Tiepelman, 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d 179, 717 N.W.2d 1; however, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132114 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
presents a question of law that we review de novo. Dane County DHS v. Ponn P., 2005 WI 32, ¶14, 279 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64232 - 2014-09-15
presents a question of law that we review de novo. Dane County DHS v. Ponn P., 2005 WI 32, ¶14, 279 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64232 - 2014-09-15
Waukesha County v. Markus Meinhardt
on that issue. Id. In addition, the legality of a traffic stop is a question of law which we also review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3547 - 2005-03-31
on that issue. Id. In addition, the legality of a traffic stop is a question of law which we also review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3547 - 2005-03-31
State v. Trevor A. McKee
hearing procedures were defective is a matter of law which we review de novo, owing no deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11975 - 2005-03-31
hearing procedures were defective is a matter of law which we review de novo, owing no deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11975 - 2005-03-31
Martin C. H. v. Jill E. S.
Jill asked for de novo review in circuit court. Following a trial, the court’s final order was entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25682 - 2006-06-26
Jill asked for de novo review in circuit court. Following a trial, the court’s final order was entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25682 - 2006-06-26
[PDF]
State v. Richard R. Ludeking
.) No. 94-1527-CR -5- court reviews de novo, without deference to the trial court's determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7914 - 2017-09-19
.) No. 94-1527-CR -5- court reviews de novo, without deference to the trial court's determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7914 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. 1996). We review de novo whether the facts fulfill the legal standards necessary to establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32911 - 2008-06-02
. 1996). We review de novo whether the facts fulfill the legal standards necessary to establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32911 - 2008-06-02
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Konneker v. Romano, 2010 WI 65, ¶24, 326 Wis. 2d 268
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142503 - 2015-05-27
a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Konneker v. Romano, 2010 WI 65, ¶24, 326 Wis. 2d 268
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142503 - 2015-05-27