Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15491 - 15500 of 29740 for des.
Search results 15491 - 15500 of 29740 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
issue that we decide de novo, accepting the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124310 - 2014-10-15
issue that we decide de novo, accepting the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124310 - 2014-10-15
[PDF]
Timothy J. Lipke v. Tri-County Area School Board
). This is a question that we decide de novo, without deference to the trial court’s determination. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12318 - 2017-09-21
). This is a question that we decide de novo, without deference to the trial court’s determination. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12318 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of law, which we review de novo. See Naydihor, 270 Wis. 2d 585 at ¶11. ¶11 Bravick asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33176 - 2014-09-15
of law, which we review de novo. See Naydihor, 270 Wis. 2d 585 at ¶11. ¶11 Bravick asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33176 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179279 - 2017-09-21
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179279 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Darrell C. Solfest
, the issue presented by this case is one of statutory construction. As such, a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12201 - 2017-09-21
, the issue presented by this case is one of statutory construction. As such, a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12201 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Richard W. Schlueter
of the parties.” DISCUSSION ¶9 We review a circuit court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5104 - 2017-09-19
of the parties.” DISCUSSION ¶9 We review a circuit court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5104 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
William R. Davis v. Miron Construction Co., Inc.
is a question of law we review de novo. See Kania v. Airborne Freight Corp., 99 Wis.2d 746, 758, 300 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13157 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law we review de novo. See Kania v. Airborne Freight Corp., 99 Wis.2d 746, 758, 300 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13157 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or correctly. The construction of a settlement agreement is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=306738 - 2020-11-24
or correctly. The construction of a settlement agreement is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=306738 - 2020-11-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional fact de novo. Id. ¶12 Based on the testimony at the suppression hearing and the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132848 - 2017-09-21
of constitutional fact de novo. Id. ¶12 Based on the testimony at the suppression hearing and the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132848 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. John F. Draves
de novo. See id. at 25, 496 N.W.2d at 104-05. NOS. 96-1466-CR 96-1467-CR 4 A court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10859 - 2017-09-20
de novo. See id. at 25, 496 N.W.2d at 104-05. NOS. 96-1466-CR 96-1467-CR 4 A court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10859 - 2017-09-20