Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15491 - 15500 of 49819 for our.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
before us is whether the circuit court properly exercised its sentencing discretion. Based upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792620 - 2024-04-30

CA Blank Order
her parental rights to her son. Juanita has responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92442 - 2013-01-31

[PDF] NOTICE
with the telephone and her attempting to make a call, based on our encounter with her and her conduct and how she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31663 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
, and that courts understand that fact “sufficiently not to make it a basis for our sentencing.” In addition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30650 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for involuntary medication and treatment, which is uncontested on appeal. ANALYSIS ¶5 Our standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123655 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. 102.23(6). Our role involves the narrow task of searching the record for evidence that would support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30104 - 2007-08-28

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. No. 2020AP19-CR 2 exercised its discretion in its sentencing of her. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=363643 - 2021-05-05

[PDF] State v. John R. Martin
that these possible issues have no arguable merit. Based upon our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11309 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Willie Bankston
). Our review is limited to determining whether there exists: evidence that discretion was in fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8335 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. David W. Oakley
for this turn of events are not relevant to our disposition on appeal. No. 99-3328-CR 3 ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16335 - 2017-09-21