Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1551 - 1560 of 45115 for Cost-effective.

[PDF] Steven D. Pederson v. Town Board of the Town of Windsor
before the board held on Pederson's proposed final CSM, Pederson proposed sharing the cost of improving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8378 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI App 7
motion seeking fees, costs, and attorney fees, much less raise any argument about the specific effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612615 - 2023-04-06

Thomas R. Jorns v. The Town Board of the Town of Jacksonport
as a matter of law by: (1) concluding the road would not benefit the public; (2) excluding construction costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25994 - 2006-07-24

[PDF] Thomas R. Jorns v. The Town Board of the Town of Jacksonport
) concluding the road would not benefit the public; (2) excluding construction costs from the advantages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25994 - 2017-09-21

Chapter 20B - Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys (20:2.1 through 20:8.5)
legal terms may be of little value to a client, especially where practical considerations, such as cost
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1077 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Chapter 20B - Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys (20:2.1 through 20:8.5)
value to a client, especially where practical considerations, such as cost or effects on other people
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1077 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, or property, or to the effect therein specified, with costs. If the defendant accepts the offer and serves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155956 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Michael A. Stauffacher v. Douglas E. Stoneman
for the Trial Court, to determine whether the tax forms have been properly prepared, and to, in effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10712 - 2017-09-20

Michael A. Stauffacher v. Douglas E. Stoneman
, Stoneman argues that the trial court erred in awarding $3,828.35 in costs and fees because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10712 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in lieu thereof as amended Wis. Stat. s. 802.05 (Effective 07-01-05)
. The court now issues this supplemental order, effective July 1, 2005, as follows: Section 1. 230.85 (3
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18689 - 2017-09-21