Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1551 - 1560 of 7591 for ow.
Search results 1551 - 1560 of 7591 for ow.
COURT OF APPEALS
2011, alleging Jerome had defaulted on the note and owed Mark the remaining balance of $15,666.57, plus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103304 - 2013-10-21
2011, alleging Jerome had defaulted on the note and owed Mark the remaining balance of $15,666.57, plus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103304 - 2013-10-21
State v. Robert W. Sweat
already made to the victims would not offset the amount that Sweat owed to his victims, that his 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9391 - 2005-03-31
already made to the victims would not offset the amount that Sweat owed to his victims, that his 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9391 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
capped damages at $5000. Olsen filed an answer admitting that she owed rent No. 2008AP2198-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35314 - 2014-09-15
capped damages at $5000. Olsen filed an answer admitting that she owed rent No. 2008AP2198-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35314 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Robert W. Sweat
to the victims would not offset the amount that Sweat owed to his victims, that his 1990 bankruptcy discharge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9391 - 2017-09-19
to the victims would not offset the amount that Sweat owed to his victims, that his 1990 bankruptcy discharge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9391 - 2017-09-19
2010 WI APP 109
that the County owes them increased vacation benefits under a County ordinance must be first resolved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51764 - 2010-08-24
that the County owes them increased vacation benefits under a County ordinance must be first resolved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51764 - 2010-08-24
David J. Winkel v.
, of which almost $33,000 was owed to several subcontractors. At that time, he discussed with his clients
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17200 - 2005-03-31
, of which almost $33,000 was owed to several subcontractors. At that time, he discussed with his clients
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17200 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark H. Price
the “objective test.” Owing to Price's decision to enter a plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10367 - 2017-09-20
the “objective test.” Owing to Price's decision to enter a plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10367 - 2017-09-20
2010 WI APP 111
, SCC has not paid him since March 1, 2006, and owes Schuh approximately $15,934.00. ¶3 In 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52646 - 2010-08-24
, SCC has not paid him since March 1, 2006, and owes Schuh approximately $15,934.00. ¶3 In 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52646 - 2010-08-24
COURT OF APPEALS
the court having lowered the dollar amount of the money due and owing to her from $11,200 to $8900. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31592 - 2008-01-22
the court having lowered the dollar amount of the money due and owing to her from $11,200 to $8900. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31592 - 2008-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS
the indebtedness owed under the note and filed a foreclosure action. Scarpace counterclaimed, asserting that Chase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94342 - 2013-03-26
the indebtedness owed under the note and filed a foreclosure action. Scarpace counterclaimed, asserting that Chase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94342 - 2013-03-26