Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1551 - 1560 of 46941 for shows.
Search results 1551 - 1560 of 46941 for shows.
COURT OF APPEALS
endangering safety if the State presents evidence that shows beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141238 - 2015-05-04
endangering safety if the State presents evidence that shows beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141238 - 2015-05-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of trial counsel, Jones must show both deficient performance and prejudice. See Strickland v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181976 - 2017-09-21
assistance of trial counsel, Jones must show both deficient performance and prejudice. See Strickland v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181976 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Saul R. Lopez
) and a defendant later shows that the plea is likely to result in the defendant's deportation, exclusion from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8091 - 2017-09-19
) and a defendant later shows that the plea is likely to result in the defendant's deportation, exclusion from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8091 - 2017-09-19
Matthew M. v. Walworth County Department of Health and Human Services
with Baker but argues that the Department did not make an affirmative showing of a good faith, reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5743 - 2005-03-31
with Baker but argues that the Department did not make an affirmative showing of a good faith, reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5743 - 2005-03-31
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Theodore F. Mazza
report showed he was concerned about Mr. Mazza's anxiety about returning to the practice of law
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16840 - 2005-03-31
report showed he was concerned about Mr. Mazza's anxiety about returning to the practice of law
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16840 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard C. Bents
, but did permit him to testify that he refused the test because the officer refused to show him the breath
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8558 - 2005-03-31
, but did permit him to testify that he refused the test because the officer refused to show him the breath
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8558 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Richard C. Bents
the test because the officer refused to show him the breath alcohol regulations. Generally, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8558 - 2017-09-19
the test because the officer refused to show him the breath alcohol regulations. Generally, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8558 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing report. “‘To prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, the defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48456 - 2010-03-29
sentencing report. “‘To prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, the defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48456 - 2010-03-29
State v. Frank J. Sackatook, Jr.
him of his right to a unanimous verdict. The record shows that the trial court informed Sackatook
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3275 - 2005-03-31
him of his right to a unanimous verdict. The record shows that the trial court informed Sackatook
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3275 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frank J. Sackatook, Jr.
him of his right to a unanimous verdict. The record shows that the trial court informed Sackatook
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3274 - 2005-03-31
him of his right to a unanimous verdict. The record shows that the trial court informed Sackatook
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3274 - 2005-03-31