Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1551 - 1560 of 46938 for shows.

COURT OF APPEALS
the blood test results showing that Martinez had tetrahydrocannabinols (THC) in his blood at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145573 - 2009-07-01

[PDF] Louis H. Knipfel v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
room records also show that Knipfel had a history of chronic back pain prior to the accident. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7186 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Bernhard Trivalos v. F.H. Resort Limited Partnership
trailer and because no No. 01-0236 2 evidence was provided to show that Fox Hills converted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3542 - 2017-09-19

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John Miller Carroll
. Specifically, the petitioner must show by clear, satisfactory and convincing evidence that he or she has
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18879 - 2005-07-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
hotel that showed a copy of Mannery’s driver’s license; it was their practice to photocopy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=657002 - 2023-05-16

CA Blank Order
the notation in the record sufficient to show that Steckhan was adequately advised of his right to counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99511 - 2013-07-23

State v. Richard C. Bents
, but did permit him to testify that he refused the test because the officer refused to show him the breath
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8558 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Richard C. Bents
the test because the officer refused to show him the breath alcohol regulations. Generally, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8558 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing report. “‘To prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, the defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48456 - 2010-03-29

State v. Frank J. Sackatook, Jr.
him of his right to a unanimous verdict. The record shows that the trial court informed Sackatook
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3275 - 2005-03-31