Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15501 - 15510 of 58916 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 15501 - 15510 of 58916 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Bradford F. Lescher
modification. Lescher claims the trial court erred in imposing a sixty-day electronic surveillance sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9238 - 2005-03-31
modification. Lescher claims the trial court erred in imposing a sixty-day electronic surveillance sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9238 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of appellate counsel claims in the circuit court and for not filing a timely notice of appeal from the denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49111 - 2010-04-19
of appellate counsel claims in the circuit court and for not filing a timely notice of appeal from the denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49111 - 2010-04-19
James Robleski v. Vernon Moore
possession claim; and (3) the trial court failed to address the issue of privity. Because the record fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2851 - 2005-03-31
possession claim; and (3) the trial court failed to address the issue of privity. Because the record fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2851 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Albert Steven Winfrey
. This claim is waived for lack of a proper record. In order to obtain appellate review of an ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7907 - 2017-09-19
. This claim is waived for lack of a proper record. In order to obtain appellate review of an ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7907 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Bradford F. Lescher
. Lescher claims the trial court erred in imposing a sixty-day electronic surveillance sentence. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9238 - 2017-09-19
. Lescher claims the trial court erred in imposing a sixty-day electronic surveillance sentence. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9238 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
. At a nonevidentiary hearing, the trial court denied the bulk of Earl’s motion from the bench,[2] including his claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120414 - 2014-09-02
. At a nonevidentiary hearing, the trial court denied the bulk of Earl’s motion from the bench,[2] including his claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120414 - 2014-09-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; and (4) his plea was not knowingly and voluntarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=331042 - 2021-02-09
on his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; and (4) his plea was not knowingly and voluntarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=331042 - 2021-02-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
. No. 2009AP187 2 counsel was ineffective for raising ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49111 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2009AP187 2 counsel was ineffective for raising ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49111 - 2014-09-15
E.A. Richards v. Grunau Company, Inc.
from a trial court grant of summary judgment dismissing his claim against Grunau Company, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11346 - 2005-03-31
from a trial court grant of summary judgment dismissing his claim against Grunau Company, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11346 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joshua J. Alderman
counsel. To substantiate a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, a defendant must prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20459 - 2005-11-30
counsel. To substantiate a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, a defendant must prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20459 - 2005-11-30