Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15501 - 15510 of 29740 for des.
Search results 15501 - 15510 of 29740 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Ventae Parrow
entitle the defendant to relief, is a question of law to be reviewed de novo by this court. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14988 - 2017-09-21
entitle the defendant to relief, is a question of law to be reviewed de novo by this court. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14988 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
from Schmidt’s Auto. ¶4 At the trial de novo to the court in February 2009, Mitra testified. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45732 - 2014-09-15
from Schmidt’s Auto. ¶4 At the trial de novo to the court in February 2009, Mitra testified. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45732 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State of Wisconsin ex rel., v. David H. Schwarz
presents an issue of statutory interpretation, a question of law which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16193 - 2017-09-21
presents an issue of statutory interpretation, a question of law which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16193 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
on the information in making its sentencing decision. Id., ¶26. On appeal, our review is de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73393 - 2011-11-07
on the information in making its sentencing decision. Id., ¶26. On appeal, our review is de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73393 - 2011-11-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for failing to bring available claims earlier is a question of law” that we review de novo. Romero-Georgana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=410210 - 2021-08-17
for failing to bring available claims earlier is a question of law” that we review de novo. Romero-Georgana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=410210 - 2021-08-17
Fidelis I. Omegbu v. Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District
. DISCUSSION We review de novo the trial court’s grant of summary judgment.[4] See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13074 - 2005-03-31
. DISCUSSION We review de novo the trial court’s grant of summary judgment.[4] See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13074 - 2005-03-31
Gregory J. Grambow v. Associated Dental Services, Inc.
de novo. First Federated Sav. Bank v. McDonah, 143 Wis.2d 429, 433, 422 N.W.2d 113, 115 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7946 - 2005-03-31
de novo. First Federated Sav. Bank v. McDonah, 143 Wis.2d 429, 433, 422 N.W.2d 113, 115 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7946 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
barred is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Tillman, 2005 WI App 71, ¶14, 281 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35198 - 2009-01-12
barred is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Tillman, 2005 WI App 71, ¶14, 281 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35198 - 2009-01-12
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6205 - 2005-03-31
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6205 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Randy Houle v. School District of Ashland
is a question of law we review de novo. See Koffman v. Leichtfuss, 2001 WI 111, ¶20, 246 Wis. 2d 31, 630
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6018 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law we review de novo. See Koffman v. Leichtfuss, 2001 WI 111, ¶20, 246 Wis. 2d 31, 630
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6018 - 2017-09-19