Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15511 - 15520 of 30070 for de.
Search results 15511 - 15520 of 30070 for de.
State v. Karshra C. Armstrong
de novo. See State v. Echols, 152 Wis.2d 725, 739, 449 N.W.2d 320, 325 (Ct. App. 1989
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10024 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See State v. Echols, 152 Wis.2d 725, 739, 449 N.W.2d 320, 325 (Ct. App. 1989
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10024 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(“Although this court engages in summary judgment review de novo, we nonetheless may apply waiver
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94342 - 2014-09-15
(“Although this court engages in summary judgment review de novo, we nonetheless may apply waiver
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94342 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether the facts constitute a new factor is a question of law we review de novo. Ibid. ¶11 In State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82322 - 2014-09-15
. Whether the facts constitute a new factor is a question of law we review de novo. Ibid. ¶11 In State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82322 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
comfort from her foster parents when she is scared—demonstrate that her foster parents are her “de facto
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114758 - 2014-06-11
comfort from her foster parents when she is scared—demonstrate that her foster parents are her “de facto
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114758 - 2014-06-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law, reviewable de novo.”). We construe statutes by discerning the plain meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83708 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law, reviewable de novo.”). We construe statutes by discerning the plain meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83708 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous, but whether those facts established probable cause is a legal question reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100745 - 2017-09-21
they are clearly erroneous, but whether those facts established probable cause is a legal question reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100745 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
weight deference, due weight deference, or we may review No. 2013AP2056 4 de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115918 - 2017-09-21
weight deference, due weight deference, or we may review No. 2013AP2056 4 de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115918 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David A. Lehman
Review of a trial court’s interpretation of a statute is a question of law that this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6474 - 2017-09-19
Review of a trial court’s interpretation of a statute is a question of law that this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6474 - 2017-09-19
State v. Terry V. Anderson
partnership agreement and not an investment contract. This issue presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9533 - 2005-03-31
partnership agreement and not an investment contract. This issue presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9533 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carson Darnell Combs
of statutory interpretation, which we decide de novo. See Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis. 2d 361, 364-65, 560
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18890 - 2005-07-06
of statutory interpretation, which we decide de novo. See Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis. 2d 361, 364-65, 560
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18890 - 2005-07-06