Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15511 - 15520 of 67853 for law.

State v. Willy J. Love
ineffective-assistance-of-counsel is a mixed question of law and fact. See Johnson, 133 Wis. 2d at 216, 395
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16164 - 2005-03-31

WI App 79 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP1300 Complete Title of...
of the guardian ad litem for Brandon I.R., there was a brief filed by John J. Grau of Grau Law Office of Waukesha
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96471 - 2013-06-25

COURT OF APPEALS
the implied consent law, and the officer issued him a “Notice of Intent to Revoke Operating Privilege.” (Some
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104473 - 2013-11-18

[PDF] NOTICE
constitutes an obstruction as a matter of law.”). However, the State decided not to pursue this argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53818 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Woodland/Alloy Casting, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
benefits following a hearing before the administrative law judge. He filed a petition for review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2209 - 2017-09-19

Donald P. Mueller v. Sentry Insurance
Mendrok’s summary judgment motion, holding that as a matter of law Mendrok’s negligence could not have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3969 - 2005-03-31

Estate of Harold Seidl v. Wisconsin Public Service Corporation
ignored the law and the jury instructions.[1] The jury failed to make a total damages finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25952 - 2006-07-17

[PDF] Precision Erecting, Inc. v. AFW Foundry, Inc.
agency relationship. Our supreme court recently surveyed issue preclusion case law and explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13823 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of law.” WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2). “We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984590 - 2025-07-17

Duane Lesky v. County of La Crosse
as a matter of law on both claims. We therefore affirm. BACKGROUND Lesky entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14245 - 2005-03-31