Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15521 - 15530 of 30164 for de.
Search results 15521 - 15530 of 30164 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Ventae Parrow
entitle the defendant to relief, is a question of law to be reviewed de novo by this court. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14988 - 2017-09-21
entitle the defendant to relief, is a question of law to be reviewed de novo by this court. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14988 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
County of Dunn v. Joseph W. Uetz
, despite our de novo standard of review, we value the circuit court's opinion. See Scheunemann v. West
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5130 - 2017-09-19
, despite our de novo standard of review, we value the circuit court's opinion. See Scheunemann v. West
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5130 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Charles W. Randle
application of § 973.12(1) to undisputed facts presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2202 - 2017-09-19
application of § 973.12(1) to undisputed facts presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2202 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law, reviewable de novo.”). We construe statutes by discerning the plain meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83708 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law, reviewable de novo.”). We construe statutes by discerning the plain meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83708 - 2014-09-15
State v. David J. Baertschi
defense, are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 633-34, 369
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15607 - 2005-03-31
defense, are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 633-34, 369
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15607 - 2005-03-31
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6212 - 2005-03-31
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6212 - 2005-03-31
State v. James C. Berlin
statutory and constitutional muster are questions of law subject to de novo review. Id. at 137-38, 456 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9373 - 2005-03-31
statutory and constitutional muster are questions of law subject to de novo review. Id. at 137-38, 456 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9373 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Michael Hupy & Associates v. Ameritech Publishing, Inc.
judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards as did the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6090 - 2017-09-19
judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards as did the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6090 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
pending this appeal. We review the grant of summary judgment de novo. Village of Slinger v. Polk
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456151 - 2021-11-24
pending this appeal. We review the grant of summary judgment de novo. Village of Slinger v. Polk
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456151 - 2021-11-24
[PDF]
State v. Bruce Nuttleman
of law that we review de novo. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d at 356, 525 N.W.2d at 104. Pepper knew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13102 - 2017-09-21
of law that we review de novo. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d at 356, 525 N.W.2d at 104. Pepper knew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13102 - 2017-09-21