Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15521 - 15530 of 50100 for our.
Search results 15521 - 15530 of 50100 for our.
CA Blank Order
findings are not clearly erroneous and its decision represents an appropriate exercise of discretion. Our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112550 - 2014-05-20
findings are not clearly erroneous and its decision represents an appropriate exercise of discretion. Our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112550 - 2014-05-20
[PDF]
Gary E. Andrashko v. Gary R. McCaughtry
, 267 N.W.2d at 20. Our inquiry is limited to whether any reasonable view of the evidence supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8920 - 2017-09-19
, 267 N.W.2d at 20. Our inquiry is limited to whether any reasonable view of the evidence supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8920 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
. The circuit court conducted a plea colloquy, and our review of the record satisfies us that the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107054 - 2014-01-16
. The circuit court conducted a plea colloquy, and our review of the record satisfies us that the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107054 - 2014-01-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Prude has ignored our warnings regarding repetitive filings. See Prude, No. 2007AP1077, unpublished
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105382 - 2017-09-21
that Prude has ignored our warnings regarding repetitive filings. See Prude, No. 2007AP1077, unpublished
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105382 - 2017-09-21
State v. Shalamar Bursinger
was sufficient to uphold the jury’s determination. ¶11 Our review of a sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19778 - 2005-10-03
was sufficient to uphold the jury’s determination. ¶11 Our review of a sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19778 - 2005-10-03
CA Blank Order
arguable merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins with a “presumption that the [circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137148 - 2015-03-08
arguable merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins with a “presumption that the [circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137148 - 2015-03-08
State v. Sheryl D. Stuckey
after revocation on May 10, 1995. Stuckey places principal reliance on our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12850 - 2005-03-31
after revocation on May 10, 1995. Stuckey places principal reliance on our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12850 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
her parental rights to her son. Juanita has responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92442 - 2013-01-31
her parental rights to her son. Juanita has responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92442 - 2013-01-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
2 postconviction motion. We exercise our discretion to reverse Nollenberg’s conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41508 - 2014-09-15
2 postconviction motion. We exercise our discretion to reverse Nollenberg’s conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41508 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based on our independent review of the record, we agree with appellate counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271651 - 2020-07-28
. Based on our independent review of the record, we agree with appellate counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271651 - 2020-07-28