Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15521 - 15530 of 17105 for probate/1000.
Search results 15521 - 15530 of 17105 for probate/1000.
State v. Jacqee R. Anderson
. § 946.49(1)(a). The court withheld sentence and ordered a twelve-month term of probation. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15871 - 2005-03-31
. § 946.49(1)(a). The court withheld sentence and ordered a twelve-month term of probation. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15871 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Paul Alan LeRose
a probation packet, two conferences with clients in jail and more than one hour of legal research. LeRose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2420 - 2017-09-19
a probation packet, two conferences with clients in jail and more than one hour of legal research. LeRose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2420 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Katrina French
on probation, with conditions, for seven years. She now appeals. II. ANALYSIS. ¶12 French contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6187 - 2017-09-19
on probation, with conditions, for seven years. She now appeals. II. ANALYSIS. ¶12 French contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6187 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael Brandt
of probation with an imposed and stayed seven years of imprisonment, and a $7500 fine. Shortly after the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17268 - 2005-03-31
of probation with an imposed and stayed seven years of imprisonment, and a $7500 fine. Shortly after the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17268 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, that probation was “clearly not appropriate” and that periods of supervision were necessary to “transition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36519 - 2009-05-18
, that probation was “clearly not appropriate” and that periods of supervision were necessary to “transition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36519 - 2009-05-18
[PDF]
State v. James A. H.
information to the probation officer was a “denied benefit” rather than a penalty for the purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4070 - 2017-09-20
information to the probation officer was a “denied benefit” rather than a penalty for the purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4070 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appropriately.” Linton’s attorney asked for a stayed prison sentence with probation and argued
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=534059 - 2022-06-22
appropriately.” Linton’s attorney asked for a stayed prison sentence with probation and argued
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=534059 - 2022-06-22
[PDF]
WI APP 136
with the State to “fully cooperate” lest his probation be revoked. Upon further cross- examination, Webster
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39591 - 2014-09-15
with the State to “fully cooperate” lest his probation be revoked. Upon further cross- examination, Webster
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39591 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, plus an imposed and stayed sentence with probation for the third felony. The State urged the trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174957 - 2017-09-21
, plus an imposed and stayed sentence with probation for the third felony. The State urged the trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174957 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
. 2d at 606, 712 N.W.2d at 82. The circuit court rejected probation as an option based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117632 - 2014-07-16
. 2d at 606, 712 N.W.2d at 82. The circuit court rejected probation as an option based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117632 - 2014-07-16