Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15531 - 15540 of 29817 for des.
Search results 15531 - 15540 of 29817 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
condition violates a defendant’s constitutional right is a question of law [that] this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48904 - 2010-04-12
condition violates a defendant’s constitutional right is a question of law [that] this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48904 - 2010-04-12
COURT OF APPEALS
the application of undisputed facts to a statute. This presents a question of law which we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35614 - 2009-04-14
the application of undisputed facts to a statute. This presents a question of law which we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35614 - 2009-04-14
State v. Donna J. Prill
de novo. See State v. Spaeth, 206 Wis. 2d 135, 148, 556 N.W.2d 728, 733-34 (1996). Proof of Prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4004 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See State v. Spaeth, 206 Wis. 2d 135, 148, 556 N.W.2d 728, 733-34 (1996). Proof of Prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4004 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. See Credit Acceptance Corp. v. Woodard, 2012 WI App 43, ¶6, 340 Wis. 2d 548, 812 N.W.2d 525
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125234 - 2014-10-28
de novo. See Credit Acceptance Corp. v. Woodard, 2012 WI App 43, ¶6, 340 Wis. 2d 548, 812 N.W.2d 525
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125234 - 2014-10-28
State v. Willie J. Wroten
the defective performance was prejudicial are questions of law, which we review de novo. Id. Plea Withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3390 - 2005-03-31
the defective performance was prejudicial are questions of law, which we review de novo. Id. Plea Withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3390 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gabriel R.M.
of a statute and its application to undisputed facts presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10138 - 2005-03-31
of a statute and its application to undisputed facts presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10138 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶11 Geske contends that the circumstances of his police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30295 - 2007-09-18
of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶11 Geske contends that the circumstances of his police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30295 - 2007-09-18
KHLH, Inc v. Wisconsin Land Surveyors, Ltd.
a right to indemnification is a legal issue that we decide de novo. See Kutner v. Moore, 159 Wis. 2d 120
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15384 - 2005-03-31
a right to indemnification is a legal issue that we decide de novo. See Kutner v. Moore, 159 Wis. 2d 120
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15384 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or alleges sufficient facts requiring a hearing is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168125 - 2017-09-21
or alleges sufficient facts requiring a hearing is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168125 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Randy J. G.
demonstrating the blood test results. Randy appeals. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9607 - 2017-09-19
demonstrating the blood test results. Randy appeals. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9607 - 2017-09-19