Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15531 - 15540 of 19318 for transfer by affidavit.
Search results 15531 - 15540 of 19318 for transfer by affidavit.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
failed to properly personally serve her, including her argument that police submitted a false affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182194 - 2017-09-21
failed to properly personally serve her, including her argument that police submitted a false affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182194 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Craig Damaske
the right to raise the substitution issue was prejudicial. In an affidavit attached to his WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15886 - 2017-09-21
the right to raise the substitution issue was prejudicial. In an affidavit attached to his WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15886 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 54
in Support of its Supplemental Motions in Limine; and (3) selected BSIS affidavits. BSIS argues that we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81087 - 2014-09-15
in Support of its Supplemental Motions in Limine; and (3) selected BSIS affidavits. BSIS argues that we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81087 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
proceedings require an opposing party to submit evidentiary facts by affidavit. Wis. Stat. § 802.08(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50100 - 2010-05-18
proceedings require an opposing party to submit evidentiary facts by affidavit. Wis. Stat. § 802.08(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50100 - 2010-05-18
COURT OF APPEALS
opposition to Sabaska’s summary judgment motion, Hoffman submitted an affidavit stating that Sabaska agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30068 - 2007-08-22
opposition to Sabaska’s summary judgment motion, Hoffman submitted an affidavit stating that Sabaska agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30068 - 2007-08-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
seized pursuant to a warrant does not need to be suppressed unless the affidavit in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=716537 - 2023-10-17
seized pursuant to a warrant does not need to be suppressed unless the affidavit in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=716537 - 2023-10-17
Danny L. Schroeder v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
unless otherwise noted. [2] According to his affidavit, however, Schroeder did not receive any portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3552 - 2005-03-31
unless otherwise noted. [2] According to his affidavit, however, Schroeder did not receive any portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3552 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
incorrect. We say “if” here because Miller’s motion did not include an affidavit swearing to this fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135542 - 2015-02-23
incorrect. We say “if” here because Miller’s motion did not include an affidavit swearing to this fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135542 - 2015-02-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to testify at trial, the court stated it had reviewed Claire’s affidavit but in its discretion, it would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737688 - 2023-12-13
to testify at trial, the court stated it had reviewed Claire’s affidavit but in its discretion, it would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737688 - 2023-12-13
CA Blank Order
affidavits from the witnesses he claims counsel should have called and, therefore, it is merely speculative
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103519 - 2013-10-23
affidavits from the witnesses he claims counsel should have called and, therefore, it is merely speculative
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103519 - 2013-10-23