Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15541 - 15550 of 29740 for des.
Search results 15541 - 15550 of 29740 for des.
[PDF]
Daniel R. Taylor v. Susan M. Taylor
is “in the nature of a contract,” the construction of which is a question of law we decide de novo. Rosplock v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4827 - 2017-09-19
is “in the nature of a contract,” the construction of which is a question of law we decide de novo. Rosplock v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4827 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
, which we review de novo. State v. Davis, 199 Wis. 2d 513, 519, 545 N.W.2d 244 (Ct. App. 1996). ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27166 - 2014-09-15
, which we review de novo. State v. Davis, 199 Wis. 2d 513, 519, 545 N.W.2d 244 (Ct. App. 1996). ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27166 - 2014-09-15
State v. Tecia D.B.
termination of parental rights is a legal issue subject to de novo review. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6838 - 2005-03-31
termination of parental rights is a legal issue subject to de novo review. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6838 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that Boyd directly committed the robbery when it stated that he “came back into the store” was a de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986002 - 2025-07-22
that Boyd directly committed the robbery when it stated that he “came back into the store” was a de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986002 - 2025-07-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
of a seizure. ¶9 Whether a seizure has occurred is a question of law, subject to de novo review. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28648 - 2014-09-15
of a seizure. ¶9 Whether a seizure has occurred is a question of law, subject to de novo review. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28648 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Maureen B. Fitzgerald
. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25393 - 2017-09-21
. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25393 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
William Ellingsworth v. Frederick Swiggum
of law, which this court reviews de novo without deference to the trial court's determination. Tahtinen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7954 - 2017-09-19
of law, which this court reviews de novo without deference to the trial court's determination. Tahtinen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7954 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Douglas D.
is not bound by the trial court’s conclusions of law and must decide the matter de novo. See In re Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15718 - 2017-09-21
is not bound by the trial court’s conclusions of law and must decide the matter de novo. See In re Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15718 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of evidentiary or historical fact under the clearly erroneous standard. Id., ¶18. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255163 - 2020-02-27
of evidentiary or historical fact under the clearly erroneous standard. Id., ¶18. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255163 - 2020-02-27
Marty H. Coopman v. American Family Insurance Company
and application of statutes to undisputed facts—which we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12264 - 2005-03-31
and application of statutes to undisputed facts—which we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12264 - 2005-03-31