Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15541 - 15550 of 29823 for des.
Search results 15541 - 15550 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
1, 8, 434 N.W.2d 609 (1989). First, we review de novo the legal question of whether the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104656 - 2013-11-20
1, 8, 434 N.W.2d 609 (1989). First, we review de novo the legal question of whether the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104656 - 2013-11-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
was deficient and whether the deficiency prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33046 - 2014-09-15
was deficient and whether the deficiency prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33046 - 2014-09-15
10AP1092 State v. John J. Neff
of constitutional standards to undisputed facts, a question of law which we review de novo. State v. VanLaarhoven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56318 - 2010-11-09
of constitutional standards to undisputed facts, a question of law which we review de novo. State v. VanLaarhoven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56318 - 2010-11-09
[PDF]
Justin Pichler v. United States Fire Insurance Company
§ 893.80(4), STATS. II. Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14002 - 2014-09-15
§ 893.80(4), STATS. II. Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14002 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo.” See State v. Eason, 2001 WI 98, ¶9, 245 Wis. 2d 206, 629 N.W.2d 625. Probable Cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865051 - 2024-10-23
de novo.” See State v. Eason, 2001 WI 98, ¶9, 245 Wis. 2d 206, 629 N.W.2d 625. Probable Cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865051 - 2024-10-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a legal question this court reviews de novo. Coston v. Joseph P., 222 Wis. 2d 1, 23, 586 N.W.2d 52 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989236 - 2025-07-30
is a legal question this court reviews de novo. Coston v. Joseph P., 222 Wis. 2d 1, 23, 586 N.W.2d 52 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989236 - 2025-07-30
State v. Sally Ann Minniecheske
and remand to the trial court for de novo consideration of Minniescheske’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12127 - 2005-03-31
and remand to the trial court for de novo consideration of Minniescheske’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12127 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robin Jean Sanders
requirement of reasonableness also presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7480 - 2005-03-31
requirement of reasonableness also presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7480 - 2005-03-31
State v. Milton J. Christensen
]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14444 - 2005-03-31
]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14444 - 2005-03-31
State v. Deshawn L. Harris
” that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Pulizzano, 155 Wis.2d 633, 648, 456 N.W.2d 325, 332 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11432 - 2005-03-31
” that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Pulizzano, 155 Wis.2d 633, 648, 456 N.W.2d 325, 332 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11432 - 2005-03-31