Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15541 - 15550 of 29823 for des.
Search results 15541 - 15550 of 29823 for des.
State v. Carson Darnell Combs
of statutory interpretation, which we decide de novo. See Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis. 2d 361, 364-65, 560
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18890 - 2005-07-06
of statutory interpretation, which we decide de novo. See Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis. 2d 361, 364-65, 560
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18890 - 2005-07-06
State v. Richard G. Giese
this court decides de novo. See State v. Phillips, 218 Wis.2d 180, 195, 577 N.W.2d 794, 801 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14989 - 2005-03-31
this court decides de novo. See State v. Phillips, 218 Wis.2d 180, 195, 577 N.W.2d 794, 801 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14989 - 2005-03-31
Kyle Gocha v. Joseph Shimon
of law which we review de novo by applying the same standards employed by the trial court. See Brownelli
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12215 - 2005-03-31
of law which we review de novo by applying the same standards employed by the trial court. See Brownelli
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12215 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is a legal question that we review de novo. Harvot v. Solo Cup Co., 2009 WI 85, ¶¶31-32, 320 Wis.2d 1, 768
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82292 - 2012-05-09
is a legal question that we review de novo. Harvot v. Solo Cup Co., 2009 WI 85, ¶¶31-32, 320 Wis.2d 1, 768
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82292 - 2012-05-09
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 16, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
facts, are sufficient to fulfill the constitutional standard is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27165 - 2006-11-15
facts, are sufficient to fulfill the constitutional standard is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27165 - 2006-11-15
COURT OF APPEALS
undisputed facts amount to reasonable suspicion is a question of constitutional fact subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108721 - 2014-03-05
undisputed facts amount to reasonable suspicion is a question of constitutional fact subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108721 - 2014-03-05
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence. State v. Koeppen, 2000 WI App 121, ¶33, 237 Wis. 2d 418, 614 N.W.2d 530. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59510 - 2011-01-31
evidence. State v. Koeppen, 2000 WI App 121, ¶33, 237 Wis. 2d 418, 614 N.W.2d 530. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59510 - 2011-01-31
2008 WI APP 103
deference, due-weight and de novo review, or no deference. Telemark Dev., Inc. v. DOR, 218 Wis. 2d 809, 817
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33015 - 2008-07-29
deference, due-weight and de novo review, or no deference. Telemark Dev., Inc. v. DOR, 218 Wis. 2d 809, 817
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33015 - 2008-07-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the facts satisfy the statutory standard is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033397 - 2025-11-04
the facts satisfy the statutory standard is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033397 - 2025-11-04
[PDF]
State v. Miyosha K. White
eligibility will begin is a question of law this court would ordinarily review de novo. See Hughes v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7489 - 2017-09-20
eligibility will begin is a question of law this court would ordinarily review de novo. See Hughes v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7489 - 2017-09-20