Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15541 - 15550 of 30326 for up.

Dodge Co. Department of Human Services v. Rachel W.
§ 908.03(6) as they came up. The court explained: The objection to future questions concerning compliance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3193 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
under sub (3) the state does not have to prove up this 90 day element. Now, if the state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29615 - 2007-07-09

[PDF] Norman W. Jahn v. City of Shawano
to rescind the March 3 agreement because the defendants failed to live up to the settlement agreement. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15680 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the parties had completed briefing. Thinking all issues had been fully briefed, the court moved up
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160384 - 2017-09-21

Land Title Services, Inc. v. Donald W. Kemnitz, Jr.
that goes by, that dollar number, it’s never going to go down, always is going to go up. So the attitude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5245 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
into giving up his right to a jury trial, and that Martina had sufficient discussions with his counsel about
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1060005 - 2026-01-13

John E. Pickel v. John Harr, Jr.
ended up paying more for their home. The trial court found the purchase price to be $125,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11195 - 2005-03-31

State v. Brian L. Paarmann
to walk away from Norlander. Norlander caught up with Paarmann, ordered him to stop and frisked him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8550 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
picking up his son’s mail, he found screens pulled away from the windows, the house in disarray
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94098 - 2013-03-19

[PDF] Richard E. Carter v. Audrey B. Schram
that Carter accepted the 1973 deed although it did not live up to the offer to purchase agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11487 - 2017-09-19