Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15551 - 15560 of 30120 for consulta de causas.

Elizabeth Freer v. Michael A. Whitcomb
the matter de novo. ¶13 Implicit in the trial court’s denial of Whitcomb’s motion to have the action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20975 - 2006-01-24

COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that we review de novo. Dane County DHS v. Ponn P., 2005 WI 32, ¶14, 279 Wis. 2d 169, 694
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64232 - 2011-05-17

State v. Darryl Wimbish Jones
which we review de novo. Id. ¶4 At trial Pagliaro testified that her dogs were purebred and had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6545 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Jesse Hardy Swinson v. Gary R. McCaughtry
, not that of the circuit court, and our review is de novo. See State ex rel. Whiting v. Kolb, 158 Wis. 2d 226, 233, 461
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4265 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a complaint states a claim upon which relief may be granted is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=555584 - 2022-08-16

State v. James W. Whistleman
is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Kittilstad, 231 Wis. 2d 245, 256, 603 N.W.2d 732 (1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3192 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Joe J. Davis
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. at 310 (citations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2256 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Lincoln Savings Bank v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
not resolve that multi-layered conundrum here because even under de novo review we believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10245 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to which we apply de novo review.” Saunders, 255 Wis. 2d 589, ¶15 (italics added). ¶10 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191025 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that this court reviews de novo. State v. Thames, 2005 WI App 101, ¶10, 281 Wis. 2d 772, 700 N.W.2d 285
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040799 - 2025-11-25