Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15551 - 15560 of 29740 for des.

[PDF] State v. Chester Hill
here was impermissibly suggestive. This is a constitutional question that we decide de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9830 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Peter J. Schaab
cause determination at a preliminary hearing is de novo. See State v. Johnson, 231 Wis. 2d 58, 66
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15906 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. Susan Collins
de novo. Folkman v. Quamme, 2003 WI 116, ¶12, 264 Wis. 2d 617, 665 N.W.2d 857. Here the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6793 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] William F. O'Connor v. Thomas M. Boehlke
again here. See id. Our review is de novo. Id. After independently reviewing the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9631 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Jasen Duane Dosh
the defendant’s Miranda rights were violated is a constitutional fact that is reviewed de novo. State v. Ross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12664 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of law, which we decide de novo. Id. To prevail on his ineffective assistance of counsel claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75598 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
, these alleged errors are de minimis. DuPuis postconviction motion describes correction of these errors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31408 - 2008-01-07

Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6209 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional fact de novo. Id. ¶12 Based on the testimony at the suppression hearing and the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132848 - 2015-01-13

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous ... then independently apply the law to those facts de novo.” Id. We review a circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212317 - 2018-05-09