Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15551 - 15560 of 64987 for or b.
Search results 15551 - 15560 of 64987 for or b.
State v. James G.L.
-of-home placement to contribute a stated percentage of that income towards that restitution. (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6498 - 2010-07-26
-of-home placement to contribute a stated percentage of that income towards that restitution. (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6498 - 2010-07-26
COURT OF APPEALS
did not receive a preliminary revocation hearing. Wis. Admin. Code § DOC 331.04(2)(b) provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29734 - 2007-07-17
did not receive a preliminary revocation hearing. Wis. Admin. Code § DOC 331.04(2)(b) provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29734 - 2007-07-17
COURT OF APPEALS
the State actually proved embezzlement under § 943.20(1)(b). The fact that the State could have charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29791 - 2007-07-23
the State actually proved embezzlement under § 943.20(1)(b). The fact that the State could have charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29791 - 2007-07-23
[PDF]
State v. Randy L. Burke, Sr.
code. See generally Swatek v. County of Dane, 192 Wis.2d 47, 531 N.W.2d 45 (1995). B. New
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10657 - 2017-09-20
code. See generally Swatek v. County of Dane, 192 Wis.2d 47, 531 N.W.2d 45 (1995). B. New
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10657 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Edgar Smith
that for a conspiracy to commit a crime for which the penalty is life imprisonment, the actor is guilty of a Class B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7944 - 2017-09-19
that for a conspiracy to commit a crime for which the penalty is life imprisonment, the actor is guilty of a Class B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7944 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
CORPORATION, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V. DOUGLAS M. MCCOY AND PICS, INC., D/B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65643 - 2014-09-15
CORPORATION, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V. DOUGLAS M. MCCOY AND PICS, INC., D/B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65643 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b). Furthermore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28723 - 2014-09-15
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b). Furthermore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28723 - 2014-09-15
Wisconsin Court System - Supreme Court Rules - Petition archive
Court Rules (SCR) 60.05(8)(b) and SCR 60.07(2) (18-06) Filed by: Diane Fremgen, Deputy Director of State
/scrules/archive/1806.htm - 2026-01-14
Court Rules (SCR) 60.05(8)(b) and SCR 60.07(2) (18-06) Filed by: Diane Fremgen, Deputy Director of State
/scrules/archive/1806.htm - 2026-01-14
Wisconsin Court System - Supreme Court Rules - Petition archive
, filed by Jacquelynn B. Rothstein, Director Mar 07, 2019 BBE Response to Petition, filed by Jacquelynn B
/scrules/archive/1807.htm - 2026-01-14
, filed by Jacquelynn B. Rothstein, Director Mar 07, 2019 BBE Response to Petition, filed by Jacquelynn B
/scrules/archive/1807.htm - 2026-01-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to Wisconsin. To reach that conclusion, the court relied on a compact rule, Regulation No. 2.10(b). Courts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=525132 - 2022-05-26
to Wisconsin. To reach that conclusion, the court relied on a compact rule, Regulation No. 2.10(b). Courts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=525132 - 2022-05-26