Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15561 - 15570 of 30070 for de.
Search results 15561 - 15570 of 30070 for de.
[PDF]
Ronald Berry v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
of law de novo when the case is one of first impression. Kelley Co. v. Marquardt, 172 Wis.2d 234, 245
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12014 - 2017-09-21
of law de novo when the case is one of first impression. Kelley Co. v. Marquardt, 172 Wis.2d 234, 245
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12014 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
concluded that any discrepancy between the two statements was de minimis. See Kennedy, No. 2003AP3212
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81586 - 2012-04-30
concluded that any discrepancy between the two statements was de minimis. See Kennedy, No. 2003AP3212
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81586 - 2012-04-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
subject to de novo review. Colstad, 260 Wis. 2d 406, ¶8. ¶13 Tomaw argues that the information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108721 - 2017-09-21
subject to de novo review. Colstad, 260 Wis. 2d 406, ¶8. ¶13 Tomaw argues that the information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108721 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Miguel Rocha-Castro
review de novo. See State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d 446 (1992); see also State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5109 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. See State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d 446 (1992); see also State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5109 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Penny M. Z. v. John D. R.
. Error that is de minimis does not constitute grounds for reversal. Laribee v. Laribee, 138 Wis.2d 46
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12169 - 2017-09-21
. Error that is de minimis does not constitute grounds for reversal. Laribee v. Laribee, 138 Wis.2d 46
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12169 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Chris C. Lichtenberg
¶5 Whether the right to a speedy trial has been violated is a constitutional question we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5602 - 2017-09-19
¶5 Whether the right to a speedy trial has been violated is a constitutional question we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5602 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Luetzow Industries v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
of § 77.54(6)(b), STATS., raises an issue of law that we review de novo pursuant to § 227.57(5), STATS.4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7958 - 2017-09-19
of § 77.54(6)(b), STATS., raises an issue of law that we review de novo pursuant to § 227.57(5), STATS.4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7958 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Eugene E. Volk
of a statute to undisputed facts, our review is de novo. See State v. Eesley, 225 Wis. 2d 248, 254, 591
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2511 - 2017-09-19
of a statute to undisputed facts, our review is de novo. See State v. Eesley, 225 Wis. 2d 248, 254, 591
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2511 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Eugene E. Volk
of a statute to undisputed facts, our review is de novo. See State v. Eesley, 225 Wis. 2d 248, 254, 591
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2510 - 2017-09-19
of a statute to undisputed facts, our review is de novo. See State v. Eesley, 225 Wis. 2d 248, 254, 591
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2510 - 2017-09-19
State v. Spring A. Long
, whether the deficient performance prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15730 - 2005-03-31
, whether the deficient performance prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15730 - 2005-03-31