Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15561 - 15570 of 29740 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous ... then independently apply the law to those facts de novo.” Id. We review a circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212317 - 2018-05-09

[PDF] State v. Michael E. Learmont
this court reviews de novo. See Littrup, 164 Wis.2d at 126, 473 N.W.2d at 166. Learmont's due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14673 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in a way that denied a defendant due process is a question of constitutional fact we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91825 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Eugene E. Volk
of a statute to undisputed facts, our review is de novo. See State v. Eesley, 225 Wis. 2d 248, 254, 591
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2511 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Jiles, 2003 WI 66, ¶26, 262 Wis. 2d 457, 663 N.W.2d 798. We review both determinations de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140210 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Joseph Allen Hopkins
that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Wagner, 191 Wis.2d 322, 328, 528 N.W.2d 85, 87 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7785 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Kyle Gocha v. Joseph Shimon
. 1985). An appeal from a grant of summary judgment raises an issue of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12215 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
performance was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190478 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Bernard G. Manske v. Royal Bank
breached the warranty deed. DISCUSSION We review a trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13714 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Crystal McKee v. Allstate Insurance Company
. No. 98-1377 8 De Toro v. DI-LA-CH, Inc., 31 Wis.2d 29, 33, 142 N.W.2d 192, 195 (1966). Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14018 - 2014-09-15