Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15571 - 15580 of 19311 for Type.

COURT OF APPEALS
of these defenses to the Wineberg class action, Brophy asserts, is a legally recognized type of damage under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45529 - 2010-01-11

State v. Jeremy D. Russ
or an incidental contact. It’s using force. It’s using violence to maintain control of a woman. Similar type
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20692 - 2006-01-24

[PDF] WI APP 24
Transportation Corporation (“MSTC”). Id. at 426. At the taking, the MSTC was a franchised monopoly-type
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31586 - 2014-09-15

State v. Shirley J. Peters
of the cycle of abuse, the type of conduct expected in an abusive relationship, and the responses of victims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3663 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. Eisch, 96 Wis. 2d 25, 31, 291 N.W.2d 800 (1980)). Acts of the same type will be considered different
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94485 - 2013-03-25

Philip T. Sliwinski v. The Board of Fire and Police Commissioners of the City of Milwaukee
.” The FBI’s typed report of what Bonilla told them indicates that Bonilla and Velasquez “decided to go up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21576 - 2006-02-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
will not be issued by the local inspection department without some type of sign-off from the DNR.” ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97145 - 2014-09-15

State v. Peter C. Ramuta
sentences, which was punishment, deterrence, and the absolute need for community protection from this type
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5296 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. testified that this type of video contact occurred multiple times when R.H. was in Jenny’s care. J.L.B.’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936230 - 2025-04-03

COURT OF APPEALS
is the most serious of the four types of prejudice set forth above because the inability of a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66110 - 2011-06-21