Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15571 - 15580 of 65137 for or b.
Search results 15571 - 15580 of 65137 for or b.
[PDF]
Suzanne Marie Johnson v. Norman T. Johnson
, 779-80 (1991). However, § 767.255(3)(b) allows the trial court to depart from the presumptive fifty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14132 - 2014-09-15
, 779-80 (1991). However, § 767.255(3)(b) allows the trial court to depart from the presumptive fifty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14132 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kenneth S. Meidenbauer
leaving a vehicle in the prohibited place; or (b) The stopping of the vehicle is necessary to avoid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3623 - 2005-03-31
leaving a vehicle in the prohibited place; or (b) The stopping of the vehicle is necessary to avoid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3623 - 2005-03-31
Washburn County v. Mark Casper
)(b) or (6)(a). We do not believe the statute extends the responsibility of the agency this far. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11368 - 2005-03-31
)(b) or (6)(a). We do not believe the statute extends the responsibility of the agency this far. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11368 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Antoinette Kennedy
and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MICHAEL B. BRENNAN, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4705 - 2017-09-19
and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MICHAEL B. BRENNAN, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4705 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. CODE § DOC 331.04(2)(b) provides that a preliminary hearing “shall be held” unless “[t]he client has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29734 - 2014-09-15
. CODE § DOC 331.04(2)(b) provides that a preliminary hearing “shall be held” unless “[t]he client has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29734 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jerald J. McDowell
substance with intent to deliver, as a subsequent offense, contrary to §§ 161.16(2)(b)1, 161.41(1m)(cm)1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10593 - 2017-09-20
substance with intent to deliver, as a subsequent offense, contrary to §§ 161.16(2)(b)1, 161.41(1m)(cm)1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10593 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Randy L. Burke, Sr.
code. See generally Swatek v. County of Dane, 192 Wis.2d 47, 531 N.W.2d 45 (1995). B. New
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10657 - 2017-09-20
code. See generally Swatek v. County of Dane, 192 Wis.2d 47, 531 N.W.2d 45 (1995). B. New
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10657 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey G. Steffensen
-CR 2 concentration pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(b). The arresting officer conducted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2696 - 2017-09-19
-CR 2 concentration pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(b). The arresting officer conducted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2696 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
(1)(b). ¶3 During the plea colloquy, the circuit court correctly informed Grant that he faced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30036 - 2007-08-20
(1)(b). ¶3 During the plea colloquy, the circuit court correctly informed Grant that he faced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30036 - 2007-08-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
B. HUBER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J., Mangerson and Stark, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100805 - 2017-09-21
B. HUBER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J., Mangerson and Stark, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100805 - 2017-09-21