Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15581 - 15590 of 30070 for de.

[PDF] State v. Bruce Nuttleman
of law that we review de novo. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d at 356, 525 N.W.2d at 104. Pepper knew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13102 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
). ¶6 Whether police conduct was coercive is a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59405 - 2011-01-26

Rodney Rowsey v. Kenneth Morgan
we review de novo. Id. However, if the defendant fails to allege sufficient facts in his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12614 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
DISCUSSION ¶5 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190546 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Patricia A. Leider v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo. DOR v. Milwaukee Brewers Baseball
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8183 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Daniel R. Taylor v. Susan M. Taylor
is “in the nature of a contract,” the construction of which is a question of law we decide de novo. Rosplock v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4827 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo. State v. Grady, 2009 WI 47, ¶13, 317 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=428792 - 2021-09-22

[PDF] Russell A. Jorgensen v. Dean G. Katz
de novo. See Wegner v. Heritage Mut. Ins. Co., 173 Wis.2d 118, 123, 496 N.W.2d 140, 142 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8826 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
review de novo. See id., ¶44. ¶7 Although we are not bound by LIRC’s legal conclusions, we may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35614 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, this court will “uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196467 - 2017-09-21