Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15581 - 15590 of 29740 for des.
Search results 15581 - 15590 of 29740 for des.
Jesse Hardy Swinson v. Gary R. McCaughtry
, not that of the circuit court, and our review is de novo. See State ex rel. Whiting v. Kolb, 158 Wis. 2d 226, 233, 461
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4265 - 2005-03-31
, not that of the circuit court, and our review is de novo. See State ex rel. Whiting v. Kolb, 158 Wis. 2d 226, 233, 461
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4265 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). “Sufficiency of the motion is a question of law, which we review de novo.” State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194499 - 2017-09-21
). “Sufficiency of the motion is a question of law, which we review de novo.” State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194499 - 2017-09-21
State v. Chester Hill
was impermissibly suggestive. This is a constitutional question that we decide de novo. State v. Kaelin, 196 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9830 - 2005-03-31
was impermissibly suggestive. This is a constitutional question that we decide de novo. State v. Kaelin, 196 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9830 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 5, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Ap...
, but we review de novo questions of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92439 - 2013-02-04
, but we review de novo questions of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92439 - 2013-02-04
CA Blank Order
the circuit court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135181 - 2015-02-12
the circuit court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135181 - 2015-02-12
State v. Richard R. Ludeking
of a statute when the facts are not disputed presents an issue of law, which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7914 - 2005-03-31
of a statute when the facts are not disputed presents an issue of law, which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7914 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Housing Partnership Corporation v. Ms. Renee Miller
this court reviews de novo. See id. at 549, 334 N.W.2d at 258. Neither party disputes the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12190 - 2017-09-21
this court reviews de novo. See id. at 549, 334 N.W.2d at 258. Neither party disputes the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12190 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
satisfy the statutory standard for recommitment is a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=269568 - 2020-07-15
satisfy the statutory standard for recommitment is a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=269568 - 2020-07-15
[PDF]
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
in briefing this aspect of the appeal was de minimis; 2) More importantly, Santich's brief, although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11669 - 2017-09-19
in briefing this aspect of the appeal was de minimis; 2) More importantly, Santich's brief, although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11669 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth L. Larson
of law subject to de novo review. State v. Richardson, 156 Wis.2d 128, 137-38, 456 N.W.2d 830, 833
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9365 - 2017-09-19
of law subject to de novo review. State v. Richardson, 156 Wis.2d 128, 137-38, 456 N.W.2d 830, 833
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9365 - 2017-09-19