Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15591 - 15600 of 30007 for consulta de causas.
Search results 15591 - 15600 of 30007 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
NOTICE
review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996)]. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27185 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996)]. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27185 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. STAT. § 799.209. We interpret statutes de novo. Scholten Pattern Works, Inc. v. Roadway Express
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30818 - 2014-09-15
. STAT. § 799.209. We interpret statutes de novo. Scholten Pattern Works, Inc. v. Roadway Express
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30818 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. David W. Janke
are satisfied are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8748 - 2017-09-19
are satisfied are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8748 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Robert E. Bowman v. Dane County Board of Adjustment
). Additionally, interpretation of an ordinance is a question of law which we review de novo. Browndale Int’l
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11252 - 2017-09-19
). Additionally, interpretation of an ordinance is a question of law which we review de novo. Browndale Int’l
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11252 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of reasonable suspicion de novo. See id. ¶10 Here, the circuit court found that Jaeger’s initial stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73001 - 2011-11-01
of reasonable suspicion de novo. See id. ¶10 Here, the circuit court found that Jaeger’s initial stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73001 - 2011-11-01
State v. Milton J. Christensen
]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14444 - 2005-03-31
]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14444 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gary A. Michels
that this court reviews de novo. See id. at 302. ¶6 The statute in question, Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4672 - 2005-03-31
that this court reviews de novo. See id. at 302. ¶6 The statute in question, Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4672 - 2005-03-31
State v. Willie J. Wroten
the defective performance was prejudicial are questions of law, which we review de novo. Id. Plea Withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3390 - 2005-03-31
the defective performance was prejudicial are questions of law, which we review de novo. Id. Plea Withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3390 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to confrontation. Manuel, 281 Wis. 2d 554, ¶25. This presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30565 - 2007-10-16
to confrontation. Manuel, 281 Wis. 2d 554, ¶25. This presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30565 - 2007-10-16
Community Care Organization of Milwaukee County, Inc. v. Evelyn O.
are recoverable, is a question of law that is subject to our de novo review. Elliott v. Donahue, 169 Wis.2d 310
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11147 - 2005-03-31
are recoverable, is a question of law that is subject to our de novo review. Elliott v. Donahue, 169 Wis.2d 310
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11147 - 2005-03-31