Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15591 - 15600 of 30072 for de.
Search results 15591 - 15600 of 30072 for de.
2009 WI APP 17
to the constitutionality of an ordinance presents a question of law that we review de novo. See Wilke v. City of Appleton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34744 - 2009-01-27
to the constitutionality of an ordinance presents a question of law that we review de novo. See Wilke v. City of Appleton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34744 - 2009-01-27
[PDF]
Dodge County v. Ryan E. M.
in the context of WIS. STAT. § 51.20(7)(a). This is a question of law that we review de novo. Hinrichs v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3914 - 2017-09-20
in the context of WIS. STAT. § 51.20(7)(a). This is a question of law that we review de novo. Hinrichs v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3914 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Jiles, 2003 WI 66, ¶26, 262 Wis. 2d 457, 663 N.W.2d 798. We review both determinations de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140210 - 2017-09-21
. Jiles, 2003 WI 66, ¶26, 262 Wis. 2d 457, 663 N.W.2d 798. We review both determinations de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140210 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that a prosecutor’s conduct constitutes “overreaching,” however, present issues subject to our de novo review. Cf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=684551 - 2023-08-02
that a prosecutor’s conduct constitutes “overreaching,” however, present issues subject to our de novo review. Cf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=684551 - 2023-08-02
[PDF]
State v. Bruce Nuttleman
of law that we review de novo. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d at 356, 525 N.W.2d at 104. Pepper knew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13102 - 2017-09-21
of law that we review de novo. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d at 356, 525 N.W.2d at 104. Pepper knew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13102 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Randy J. G.
demonstrating the blood test results. Randy appeals. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9607 - 2017-09-19
demonstrating the blood test results. Randy appeals. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9607 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
Wis. 2d 179, 717 N.W.2d 1. Whether this right has been denied is a question we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30467 - 2014-09-15
Wis. 2d 179, 717 N.W.2d 1. Whether this right has been denied is a question we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30467 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Droegkamp is a “prevailing” party is a question of law that we review de novo. See Shadley v. Lloyds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69856 - 2011-08-16
Droegkamp is a “prevailing” party is a question of law that we review de novo. See Shadley v. Lloyds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69856 - 2011-08-16
[PDF]
State v. Roger Sundquist
, is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the circuit court’s decision. Id. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18199 - 2017-09-21
, is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the circuit court’s decision. Id. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18199 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Owen Andrew Kreinus
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Johnson, 210 Wis. 2d 196, 203, 565 N.W.2d 191 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17754 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Johnson, 210 Wis. 2d 196, 203, 565 N.W.2d 191 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17754 - 2017-09-21