Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15591 - 15600 of 69169 for he.
Search results 15591 - 15600 of 69169 for he.
Marathon County v. Daniel J. Hart
judgment against him. He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5112 - 2005-03-31
judgment against him. He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5112 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). No. 2019AP2287 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Roberto Hinojosa appeals an order denying his mandamus petition. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=352020 - 2021-04-01
). No. 2019AP2287 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Roberto Hinojosa appeals an order denying his mandamus petition. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=352020 - 2021-04-01
State v. Scott L. Zimmermann
. He argues that before the trial court may find a refusal to take a chemical test to have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12156 - 2005-03-31
. He argues that before the trial court may find a refusal to take a chemical test to have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12156 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
supervision. His judgment of conviction indicated eligibility for the Substance Abuse Program (SAP), but he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062572 - 2026-01-15
supervision. His judgment of conviction indicated eligibility for the Substance Abuse Program (SAP), but he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062572 - 2026-01-15
COURT OF APPEALS
under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2005–06).[1] Singleton argues that he received ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32209 - 2008-03-24
under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2005–06).[1] Singleton argues that he received ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32209 - 2008-03-24
State v. Gregory K. Scott
agrees with the State's contention that Scott has inadequately briefed many issues he seeks to raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11598 - 2005-03-31
agrees with the State's contention that Scott has inadequately briefed many issues he seeks to raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11598 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction extending and modifying his probation. Jensen argues he was not afforded due process because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50570 - 2010-06-01
of conviction extending and modifying his probation. Jensen argues he was not afforded due process because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50570 - 2010-06-01
COURT OF APPEALS
Elm testified that he and his partner drove toward the two males to investigate whether they might
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32338 - 2008-04-07
Elm testified that he and his partner drove toward the two males to investigate whether they might
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32338 - 2008-04-07
State v. John D. Walker
after midnight in Beloit. A police officer testified he saw the vehicle back up approximately fifty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10221 - 2005-03-31
after midnight in Beloit. A police officer testified he saw the vehicle back up approximately fifty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10221 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Marathon County v. Daniel J. Hart
the court’s default judgment against him. He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5112 - 2017-09-19
the court’s default judgment against him. He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5112 - 2017-09-19