Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1561 - 1570 of 69135 for as he.
Search results 1561 - 1570 of 69135 for as he.
State v. Robert E. Tucker
PER CURIAM. Robert E. Tucker appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after he pled guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4730 - 2005-03-31
PER CURIAM. Robert E. Tucker appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after he pled guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4730 - 2005-03-31
State v. Stephen Toliver
, and from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He raises numerous issues. We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3011 - 2005-03-31
, and from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He raises numerous issues. We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3011 - 2005-03-31
State v. Warren J. Pik
(second offense), contrary to §§ 943.01(1), 346.63(1)(a), and 346.65(2), Stats. He also appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8992 - 2005-03-31
(second offense), contrary to §§ 943.01(1), 346.63(1)(a), and 346.65(2), Stats. He also appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8992 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kenneth L. Lee
hearing, Lee acknowledged that he had reviewed a standard plea questionnaire/waiver of rights form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6982 - 2005-03-31
hearing, Lee acknowledged that he had reviewed a standard plea questionnaire/waiver of rights form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6982 - 2005-03-31
State v. Warren J. Pik
(second offense), contrary to §§ 943.01(1), 346.63(1)(a), and 346.65(2), Stats. He also appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8991 - 2005-03-31
(second offense), contrary to §§ 943.01(1), 346.63(1)(a), and 346.65(2), Stats. He also appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8991 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. Nicolas Subdiaz-Osorio appeals a judgment of conviction. He argues that the court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89347 - 2012-11-14
PER CURIAM. Nicolas Subdiaz-Osorio appeals a judgment of conviction. He argues that the court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89347 - 2012-11-14
COURT OF APPEALS
wife. He makes four separate arguments as to why his conviction should be overturned: 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57734 - 2010-12-14
wife. He makes four separate arguments as to why his conviction should be overturned: 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57734 - 2010-12-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of disorderly conduct and substantial battery, both as a party to a crime. He appeals the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122617 - 2014-09-30
of disorderly conduct and substantial battery, both as a party to a crime. He appeals the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122617 - 2014-09-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
. He makes four separate arguments as to why his conviction should be overturned: 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57734 - 2014-09-15
. He makes four separate arguments as to why his conviction should be overturned: 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57734 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
; (2) allowing a presentence investigation (PSI) to continue while he was still considering whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164600 - 2017-09-21
; (2) allowing a presentence investigation (PSI) to continue while he was still considering whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164600 - 2017-09-21