Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1561 - 1570 of 61999 for child support.
Search results 1561 - 1570 of 61999 for child support.
Timothy A.K. v. Carrie B.C.
an arrearage in child support that the father was ordered to pay. We affirm on the appeal and reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15880 - 2005-03-31
an arrearage in child support that the father was ordered to pay. We affirm on the appeal and reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15880 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Timothy A.K. v. Carrie B.C.
that the trial court erroneously vacated an arrearage in child support that the father was ordered to pay. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15880 - 2017-09-21
that the trial court erroneously vacated an arrearage in child support that the father was ordered to pay. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15880 - 2017-09-21
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Mary G.
discusses three issues: (1) Whether sufficient evidence supports the verdict, (2) whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4698 - 2005-03-31
discusses three issues: (1) Whether sufficient evidence supports the verdict, (2) whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4698 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Patrick L. Wolfe v. Melanie A. Wolfe
by failing to require that Patrick prove that his proposed contact was in the child's best interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15905 - 2017-09-21
by failing to require that Patrick prove that his proposed contact was in the child's best interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15905 - 2017-09-21
Patrick L. Wolfe v. Melanie A. Wolfe
to require that Patrick prove that his proposed contact was in the child's best interest and instead placing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15905 - 2005-03-31
to require that Patrick prove that his proposed contact was in the child's best interest and instead placing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15905 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. It also provided for monthly child support payments of $7652 and an increased equalization payment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806882 - 2024-05-29
. It also provided for monthly child support payments of $7652 and an increased equalization payment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806882 - 2024-05-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to serve as the guardian of the child.” A.Z. points to no legal authority supporting her assertion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622972 - 2023-02-28
to serve as the guardian of the child.” A.Z. points to no legal authority supporting her assertion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622972 - 2023-02-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
modifying child support. The respondent, Alejandra Velazquez, failed to file a brief in response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488623 - 2022-03-01
modifying child support. The respondent, Alejandra Velazquez, failed to file a brief in response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488623 - 2022-03-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and services; (2) child abuse; (3) Elizabeth had failed to assume parental responsibility; (4) Ellie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85963 - 2014-09-15
and services; (2) child abuse; (3) Elizabeth had failed to assume parental responsibility; (4) Ellie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85963 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
protection and services; (2) child abuse; (3) Elizabeth had failed to assume parental responsibility; (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85963 - 2012-08-08
protection and services; (2) child abuse; (3) Elizabeth had failed to assume parental responsibility; (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85963 - 2012-08-08