Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15601 - 15610 of 30175 for de.
Search results 15601 - 15610 of 30175 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Trevor A. McKee
were defective is a matter of law which we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11975 - 2017-09-21
were defective is a matter of law which we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11975 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that we review de novo. Dane County DHS v. Ponn P., 2005 WI 32, ¶14, 279 Wis. 2d 169, 694
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64232 - 2011-05-17
a question of law that we review de novo. Dane County DHS v. Ponn P., 2005 WI 32, ¶14, 279 Wis. 2d 169, 694
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64232 - 2011-05-17
State v. John E. Taylor
, and thus our review is de novo. See State v. Rodriguez, 205 Wis.2d 620, 626, 556 N.W.2d 140, 142 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13626 - 2005-03-31
, and thus our review is de novo. See State v. Rodriguez, 205 Wis.2d 620, 626, 556 N.W.2d 140, 142 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13626 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James Reese v. City of Pewaukee
is a question of law which we review de novo. Tobler v. Door County, 158 Wis. 2d 19, 21, 461 N.W.2d 775
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3780 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law which we review de novo. Tobler v. Door County, 158 Wis. 2d 19, 21, 461 N.W.2d 775
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3780 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. See State v. Hale, 2005 WI 7, ¶41, 277 Wis. 2d 593, 691 N.W.2d 637
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83380 - 2012-06-06
of law that we review de novo. See State v. Hale, 2005 WI 7, ¶41, 277 Wis. 2d 593, 691 N.W.2d 637
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83380 - 2012-06-06
COURT OF APPEALS
principles to those facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo.” State v. Drew, 2007 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36845 - 2009-06-17
principles to those facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo.” State v. Drew, 2007 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36845 - 2009-06-17
[PDF]
State of Wisconsin ex rel., v. David H. Schwarz
presents an issue of statutory interpretation, a question of law which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16193 - 2017-09-21
presents an issue of statutory interpretation, a question of law which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16193 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of statutory construction we review de novo. See City of La Crosse v. Richling, 178 Wis. 2d 856
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79419 - 2014-09-15
is a question of statutory construction we review de novo. See City of La Crosse v. Richling, 178 Wis. 2d 856
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79419 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
support was denied. Kathleen sought de novo review. After an evidentiary hearing, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159448 - 2017-09-21
support was denied. Kathleen sought de novo review. After an evidentiary hearing, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159448 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
$490.78 to UW Health plus costs, Turner demanded a trial de novo before the circuit court. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29180 - 2007-05-23
$490.78 to UW Health plus costs, Turner demanded a trial de novo before the circuit court. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29180 - 2007-05-23