Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15611 - 15620 of 30056 for consulta de causas.
Search results 15611 - 15620 of 30056 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
WI APP 17
a question of law that we review de novo. See Wilke v. City of Appleton, 197 Wis. 2d 717, 726, 541 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34744 - 2014-09-15
a question of law that we review de novo. See Wilke v. City of Appleton, 197 Wis. 2d 717, 726, 541 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34744 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the statute applied to Brittany’s claim. ¶6 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027257 - 2025-10-22
the statute applied to Brittany’s claim. ¶6 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027257 - 2025-10-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel presents a question of law that this court decides de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95505 - 2014-09-15
constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel presents a question of law that this court decides de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95505 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the sufficiency of the evidence de novo, but in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=444397 - 2021-10-21
the sufficiency of the evidence de novo, but in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=444397 - 2021-10-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and, if so, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 128. A. Objection to “Escape
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81988 - 2012-05-02
and, if so, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 128. A. Objection to “Escape
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81988 - 2012-05-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
, 172, 554 N.W.2d 525 (Ct. App. 1996). We review de novo whether the facts fulfill the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32911 - 2014-09-15
, 172, 554 N.W.2d 525 (Ct. App. 1996). We review de novo whether the facts fulfill the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32911 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
clearly erroneous; however, we review de novo the application of constitutional principles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59437 - 2014-09-15
clearly erroneous; however, we review de novo the application of constitutional principles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59437 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. Susan Collins
de novo. Folkman v. Quamme, 2003 WI 116, ¶12, 264 Wis. 2d 617, 665 N.W.2d 857. Here the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6793 - 2017-09-20
de novo. Folkman v. Quamme, 2003 WI 116, ¶12, 264 Wis. 2d 617, 665 N.W.2d 857. Here the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6793 - 2017-09-20
State v. Isaac J.R.
, 434 N.W.2d 773, 778 (1989). However, despite our de novo standard of review, we benefit from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12571 - 2005-03-31
, 434 N.W.2d 773, 778 (1989). However, despite our de novo standard of review, we benefit from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12571 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the record and the court does not weigh the evidence or conduct a de novo review. State ex rel. Conn. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122817 - 2014-09-30
to the record and the court does not weigh the evidence or conduct a de novo review. State ex rel. Conn. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122817 - 2014-09-30