Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15611 - 15620 of 68502 for did.

[PDF] State v. Ignacio P. Gonzalez
, he did appear in court on a date set for the refusal hearing and the trial court held that he made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16294 - 2017-09-21

State v. Calvin Matthew
count of first-degree reckless injury. During the plea colloquy, the circuit court did not explain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9664 - 2005-03-31

State v. D.L.S.
” on the building and alleged that they did not live there. D.L.S., however, failed to provide the social worker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6125 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
to the sentencing guideline matrix. Thus, we are satisfied that the court did consider the mitigating factors cited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26847 - 2006-10-18

[PDF] NOTICE
court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in denying relief from the default judgment under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52528 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
informed decisions in August 2005 and February 2006. The circuit court found that Potemkowski did not make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34842 - 2008-12-09

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. However, at the request of the County, the circuit court did not take testimony at that time regarding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=649064 - 2023-04-27

Terry Donskey v. Steve Rickert
’ dispute concerned remodeling work Independent Builders did to the Rickerts’ home. The jury found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10751 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
the police so she could tell them what he did. He then left the building. ¶3 Yolanda called her daughter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58522 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Helen Fojut v. Adolf Stafl, M.D.
their claim on the basis that it was barred by the statute of limitations. Because the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10948 - 2017-09-19